Name: free-tool-strategy
Rating: 52.8 (1 reviews)
Author: administrakt0r

free-tool-strategy

You are an expert in engineering-as-marketing strategy. Your goal is to help plan and evaluate free tools that generate leads, attract organic traffic, and build brand awareness.

Quality

59%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/free-tool-strategy/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is free-tool-strategy in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a thorough, well-sectioned strategy reference with genuinely actionable templates (scorecard, ROI formula, output document), but it is verbose, lacks an explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints, and inlines material that would benefit from separate reference files.

Suggestions

Move the large catalogs (tool types, example concepts by business type, output templates) into reference files under references/ and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

Add an explicit numbered workflow (assess → ideate → validate → build → promote → measure) with checkpoints so the sequence is unambiguous rather than implied by section order.

Trim generic discovery questions and the verbatim description restatement to tighten conciseness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is well-structured but quite long (~580 lines) and includes generic prompting content Claude already knows (e.g. 'What's the core product/service?') and a verbatim restatement of the description; it is mostly efficient but could be tightened, fitting the mid anchor.	3 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete, usable artifacts — a 1-5 scorecard with thresholds (25+/15-24/<15), an ROI projection formula with explicit calculation, and a fill-in output document template — which makes the guidance mostly executable with only minor gaps amid the higher-level principles.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A rough sequence is implied by section order (assess → ideate → validate → build/buy → MVP → promote → measure → evaluate) but it is never presented as an explicit numbered workflow with checkpoints, so sequence is present but checkpoints are implicit.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The single SKILL.md is well-organized with clear headers but is monolithic — catalogs like tool types, example concepts by business type, and output templates are all inlined rather than split into reference files, and no bundle files exist; structure is present but content that should be separate is inline.	3 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states the domain and several concrete capabilities but is written in second-person voice and omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness and lowers specificity. Adding third-person voice and a concrete trigger phrase would raise the score.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person ('Plans and evaluates free tools that...') to avoid the voice penalty on specificity.

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural triggers, e.g. 'Use when planning lead-generating free tools, engineering-as-marketing projects, or free calculators/generators for traffic and brand awareness.'

Include common synonyms like 'lead magnet' and 'lead generation' to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete actions ('plan and evaluate free tools that generate leads, attract organic traffic, and build brand awareness'), which would anchor at 4, but the second-person voice ('You are an expert...', 'Your goal is to help...') triggers the -1 specificity penalty.	3 / 5
Completeness	Has a clear 'what' (plan and evaluate free tools for leads/traffic/awareness) but no explicit 'Use when...' trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural marketing terms users would say ('free tools', 'generate leads', 'organic traffic', 'brand awareness', 'engineering-as-marketing'); a few common synonyms like 'lead generation' or 'lead magnet' are missing, so it sits just below the comprehensive anchor.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'engineering-as-marketing' / 'free tools that generate leads' niche is mostly distinct with minimal conflict risk, though it could overlap with broader marketing-strategy skills, keeping it just below the clear-niche anchor.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
skill_md_line_count	SKILL.md is long (583 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Path: plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/free-tool-strategy/SKILL.md
Commit: 57c135b

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.