CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

freshdesk-automation

Automate Freshdesk helpdesk operations including tickets, contacts, companies, notes, and replies via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/freshdesk-automation/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is freshdesk-automation in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a comprehensive Freshdesk automation reference that provides genuinely useful, specific guidance on tool parameters, query syntax, and common pitfalls. Its main weaknesses are significant repetition of key information (status/priority mappings, custom field prefix rules), monolithic structure that would benefit from splitting into reference files, and lack of complete invocation examples showing full tool calls. The workflow sequences with Required/Optional annotations are a strength.

Suggestions

Eliminate repeated information: define status/priority integer mappings and the cf_ prefix rule once in a 'Reference' section and refer back to it, rather than repeating in multiple workflow sections and Known Pitfalls.

Extract the Quick Reference table and detailed parameter lists into a separate REFERENCE.md file, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with workflow sequences and key pitfalls only.

Add at least one complete tool invocation example showing the full parameter object passed to a tool (e.g., a complete FRESHDESK_CREATE_TICKET call), rather than only listing parameters.

Remove the 'When to Use' section at the end, which adds no value beyond restating the description.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is quite long (~200+ lines) with significant repetition. Status/priority integer mappings are repeated three times (in Create Tickets, Search Tickets, and Known Pitfalls). The 'cf_' prefix distinction is mentioned twice. The 'When to Use' section at the end adds nothing. However, much of the content is genuinely useful parameter documentation and pitfall warnings that Claude wouldn't inherently know.

3 / 5

Actionability

The skill provides concrete tool names, specific parameter names with types, exact query syntax examples (e.g., `"email:'user@example.com'"`), and clear integer mappings for enums. It lacks executable code blocks or complete workflow examples showing actual tool invocations with full parameter objects, but for an MCP tool-calling skill, the guidance is specific enough to execute.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Each workflow has a clear numbered tool sequence with [Required]/[Optional]/[Prerequisite] annotations, which is helpful. The setup section includes a verification step (confirm ACTIVE status). However, there are no explicit validation/error-handling steps within the core workflows (e.g., what to do if ticket creation fails, how to handle rate limit 429 responses). Since these aren't destructive/batch operations in the traditional sense, the missing feedback loops don't trigger the cap at 3.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The content is entirely monolithic with no references to external files, despite being very long. The detailed parameter lists, pitfalls, and quick reference table could be split into separate reference files. The skill says to 'always call RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS first to get current tool schemas,' which somewhat mitigates the need for inline parameter documentation, yet it's all inlined anyway. Structure within the file (headers, table) is decent but the sheer volume suggests poor content splitting.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly identifies the target platform (Freshdesk) and lists specific entities it operates on, making it distinctive and reasonably specific. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which would help Claude know exactly when to select this skill. The operational instruction about searching tools first is useful but doesn't substitute for trigger guidance.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger phrases like 'Use when the user asks about Freshdesk, support tickets, helpdesk management, or customer support operations via Composio.'

Expand the action verbs beyond 'automate' to specify concrete operations like 'create, update, search, and delete tickets, contacts, companies, notes, and replies.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several specific entities (tickets, contacts, companies, notes, replies) and names the domain (Freshdesk helpdesk operations) with a concrete operational note about searching tools first. Minor gaps in describing specific actions beyond 'automate' — e.g., create, update, delete are not enumerated.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear — automate Freshdesk operations across several entity types. However, there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps this at 3 per the rubric guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords like 'Freshdesk', 'helpdesk', 'tickets', 'contacts', 'companies', 'notes', 'replies', and 'Composio'. Missing some synonyms or variations users might say like 'support tickets', 'customer support', 'help desk' (two words), or 'Rube MCP' context for less technical users.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive due to the specific platform name 'Freshdesk', the integration method 'Rube MCP (Composio)', and the enumerated entity types. Very unlikely to conflict with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.