Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is well-structured with excellent progressive disclosure via a verified reference index, but its design principles are high-level and the advisory workflow lacks an explicitly sequenced process with checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add a concrete good-vs-bad example for at least one component (e.g., a well-sized widget vs a cluttered one) to lift actionability.
Render the implicit workflow as an explicit numbered sequence (check context -> gather answers -> select surface -> produce the 5-part output) with a validation step.
Remove or replace the generic 'When to Use' line ('applicable to execute the workflow...') with a concrete trigger description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Principles are terse and assume Claude's knowledge ('Glanceable, immediate value.', 'Deep-link on tap.'), with only minor trims needed such as the generic 'When to Use' line and the promotional footer. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides clear directives and a concrete Output Format, but principles are largely high-level design guidance ('Respect platform context', 'Design for seconds of attention') without concrete good-vs-bad examples or specific implementation details. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence exists (check .claude/apple-design-context.md, ask Questions to Ask, produce Output Format) but it is implicit across separate sections with no explicit checkpoints or error-recovery feedback loops. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a well-signaled Reference Index table linking 9 one-level-deep reference files, all of which exist in ./references/, with topic and key-content columns for easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |