CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

interview-coach

Full job search coaching system — JD decoding, resume, storybank, mock interviews, transcript analysis, comp negotiation. 23 commands, persistent state.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/interview-coach/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is interview-coach in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a clean, well-structured landing page with concrete, executable commands and no wasted tokens. Its main limitation is that, for a 23-command system, it sequences only the entry flow and leaves the richer workflows and a command reference undocumented in the skill itself.

Suggestions

Add a brief command catalog (or a referenced COMMANDS.md) so the 23 commands are discoverable from SKILL.md rather than only four examples.

Collapse the overlapping "When to Use This Skill" and "What It Covers" sections into one to remove redundancy.

For the higher-stakes workflows (transcript scoring, comp negotiation), sketch the validation/feedback loop (e.g. score → identify gaps → drill) to lift workflow clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what interviews or transcripts are — with only minor redundancy between the "When to Use This Skill" and "What It Covers" bullets that could be tightened.

4 / 5

Actionability

Gives copy-paste executable commands (`npx skills add dbhat93/job-search-os`, `/coach kickoff`, `/coach prep Stripe Senior PM`, `/coach analyze`, `/coach salary`) covering common cases, with only minor gaps in argument detail.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The install → `/coach` → command sequence is clear and each example describes what follows, but the deeper multi-step workflows (scoring answers, transcript analysis) are not sequenced in the body — they live in the command implementations.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections (Overview, Install, When to Use, What It Covers, Examples, Source) are well-organized and easy to navigate with no nested references, but a 23-command skill could benefit from a referenced command catalog rather than inlining only four examples.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and reads as a coherent, distinctive product, but it omits any explicit "when to use" trigger guidance, which caps its completeness and limits its score.

Suggestions

Append an explicit "Use when..." clause naming natural triggers, e.g. "Use when preparing for interviews, decoding a job description, building a storybank, or negotiating an offer."

Reframe capability areas as concrete actions ("decode job descriptions, rewrite resume bullets, run mock interviews, analyze transcripts, script negotiations") to lift specificity toward the 5 anchor.

Add a few natural synonyms users say ("offer", "behavioral", "salary expectations") to round out trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and lists several concrete capability areas — "JD decoding, resume, storybank, mock interviews, transcript analysis, comp negotiation" — but these are feature-area nouns rather than verb-actions like the 5-anchor examples, leaving a minor framing gap.

4 / 5

Completeness

It has a clear "what" (a full coaching system with enumerated capabilities) but no "Use when..." or equivalent explicit trigger clause, so per the rubric guidance completeness is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms a user would say ("job search", "interview", "resume", "negotiation", "comp") with good coverage, though a few natural synonyms (e.g. "offer", "behavioral", "salary expectations") are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "full job search lifecycle" framing carves a clear niche with distinct triggers, though standalone resume or interview-prep skills present minor overlap risk.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.