Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is genuinely actionable — an executable script invocation, per-query-type search templates, and exact display formats — and its workflow is broadly sequenced with a useful self-check. But pervasive duplication roughly doubles the token cost, two conflicting 'Step 3' labels and a HOW-TO/PROMPTING enum mismatch create real ambiguity, and the monolithic 420-line structure would benefit from splitting mode-specific templates into reference files.
Suggestions
Deduplicate: state each directive once — merge the 'Output Summary Footer' stats/invitation templates with the earlier 'Show Summary' templates, keep a single wait-for-user instruction, and state the no-'Sources:' rule once; this should roughly halve the body.
Fix the sequence errors: renumber the two 'Step 3' sections (WebSearch vs. wait-for-script) into a coherent order, and make the stored QUERY_TYPE enum match the defined values (RECOMMENDATIONS | NEWS | PROMPTING | GENERAL).
Move the mode-specific display templates (full/partial vs. web-only stats blocks, tool-question options, footer variants) into a references/display-templates.md file and signal them from a short SKILL.md overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~420-line body duplicates directives extensively: "Do NOT output 'Sources:' lists" appears twice, the stats block plus "Want another prompt?" invitation is templated in two sections, the wait-for-user instruction appears three times, and the API-key upsell block appears twice. It does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the padding is pervasive rather than incidental, matching anchor 2 ('noticeably verbose; several unnecessary... padded sections') better than anchor 3. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The script invocation (mktemp + trap + python3 ... --emit=compact) is copy-paste ready, and per-QUERY_TYPE search query templates and exact display templates are concrete. Minor gaps: "Use TaskOutput" references a tool that may not exist in the runtime, and $ARGUMENTS interpolation is unexplained. Fits anchor 4 ('mostly executable guidance... minor gaps') rather than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The end-to-end sequence is present (parse intent → setup check → run script → check mode → WebSearch → synthesize → display → invitation → wait → write prompt) with one self-check, but two sections are both labeled "Step 3", making the WebSearch/wait ordering ambiguous, and the stored QUERY_TYPE enum lists HOW-TO while the body defines PROMPTING. Steps are listed but with real inconsistencies and largely implicit checkpoints, matching anchor 3 rather than anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers are clear and the one bundle reference (scripts/last30days.py) is a real, clearly signaled file, but ~420 lines inline everything with no reference files at all; the per-mode display templates and per-query-type search templates that apply only in some modes could live in separate reference files. Fits anchor 3 ('some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline'). | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |