CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

lead-magnets

When the user wants to create, plan, or optimize a lead magnet for email capture or lead generation. Also use when the user mentions "lead magnet", "gated content", "ebook", "checklist", etc.

65

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/lead-magnets/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable strategy skill with clear sequencing and properly signaled one-level references. It is held back from top marks by length/redundancy, implicit confirmation checkpoints, and detail that could be further split into references.

Suggestions

Dedupe the "cro" entry in Related Skills (currently listed twice) and trim overlap between Task-Specific Questions and the Before Planning questions to tighten conciseness.

Add an explicit checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., "Confirm the primary goal and buyer stage with the user before drafting the recommendation") to reach anchor 5 on workflow clarity.

Consider moving the detailed Gating Strategy and/or Landing Page & Delivery sections into a reference file so SKILL.md stays a leaner overview, improving progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly dense, high-value domain guidance (tables, bullets, benchmarks) rather than padding about concepts Claude already knows, but a ~300-line length and minor redundancy (e.g., the "cro" skill listed twice, task-specific questions overlapping the Before Planning block) keep it just below anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete and specific throughout: per-format effort/time, gating options with trade-offs, a numbered landing-page structure, quantified rules ("Every extra field reduces conversion by 5-10%"), and a 5-part output template. As an instruction-only skill it is mostly directly applicable, with minor gaps (no gating/form implementation specifics).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequence runs from Before Planning (context gathering, "ask if not provided") through principles/stage-matching to a defined 5-section output, and the skill is non-destructive so the validation cap does not apply. It falls short of anchor 5 only because user-confirmation checkpoints before producing the final plan are implicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Two real bundle files are clearly signaled one level deep ("See [references/format-guide.md]" and "See [references/benchmarks.md]") and detailed creation guidance/benchmarks are appropriately offloaded, but a fair amount of gating/landing/promotion detail remains inline in a long SKILL.md, a minor organization gap versus anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions with natural keywords. The main gap is trigger-term breadth and minor overlap risk from generic format words.

Suggestions

Add a few more natural trigger synonyms (e.g., "template", "free guide", "downloadable", "resource library") to broaden keyword coverage toward anchor 5.

Tighten distinctiveness by pairing generic format terms ("ebook", "checklist") with the lead-capture context so they don't risk firing for unrelated content skills.

Consider naming additional concrete actions (build, gate, deliver, measure) to raise specificity coverage beyond the create/plan/optimize trio.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"create, plan, or optimize a lead magnet for email capture or lead generation" names the domain plus several concrete actions, though coverage is limited to strategy/planning and omits building, delivery, and measurement. It sits above anchor 3 (only 1-2 actions) but below 5 (comprehensive).

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers what ("create, plan, or optimize a lead magnet for email capture or lead generation") and when ("When the user wants to..." / "Also use when the user mentions...") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor 5 example.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"lead magnet", "gated content", "ebook", "checklist" plus "email capture"/"lead generation" give good natural keyword coverage with synonyms, but common variants like "template", "free guide", or "downloadable" are absent, so it stops short of anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"lead magnet" and "gated content" carve a clear niche with low conflict risk, but broader format terms like "ebook" and "checklist" overlap with related copywriting/content-strategy skills, placing it at anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.