Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a concise, well-structured overview with concrete commands and a clear workflow including a verification step. Its main weakness is that referenced templates and the `lex` CLI are not bundled, making the guidance partially non-executable.
Suggestions
Bundle the referenced `templates/` files (e.g. `templates/02_employment_workforce.md`) under `references/` or `assets/` and link them with one-level-deep paths, or remove the references if the templates don't exist.
Provide or document the `lex` CLI (e.g. a script in `scripts/lex`) so the `lex search/get/draft/verify` commands are actually executable.
Add a validate-fix-retry loop around drafting for the high-stakes legal output, e.g. re-run `lex verify` and fix missing jurisdiction clauses before finalizing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned with mostly directive content; minor marketing fluff ('structured truth engine designed to eliminate legal hallucinations') could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete `lex search/get/draft/verify` commands with specific example invocations and paths; the gap is that the `lex` CLI is referenced but not bundled, so commands aren't runnable as-is. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence (identify jurisdiction → search/fetch → scaffold → verify) with an explicit verification checkpoint in Step 4; minor gap is the lack of a validate-fix-retry feedback loop for high-stakes legal drafting. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the body references `templates/02_employment_workforce.md` and a `lex` CLI that are not present in any bundle directory, leaving references unresolved and unsignaled. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |