Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content body is a lean, well-structured instruction sheet with genuinely executable CLI commands, a sequenced workflow ending in source verification, and concise pitfalls guidance. Its main gaps are the absence of any feedback loop for failed searches/verification, no explanation of where the 'lex' CLI comes from, and no pointer to the template catalog for discovery. It sits comfortably in the 'good' band but short of excellent on error handling.
Suggestions
Add an error-recovery branch to the workflow, e.g., 'If lex search returns no match, state the gap and fall back to the closest jurisdiction's template rather than improvising legal content.'
State how the 'lex' CLI is invoked (bundled script path, install command) so the commands are executable from the skill alone, or note that it is an external prerequisite.
Add a one-line pointer to the template catalog (e.g., 'Run lex search with no query to list all 29 jurisdiction templates') so discovery doesn't depend on guessing queries.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — compact step lists, two short CLI examples, and terse best-practice bullets — with only minor padding: the 'Truth Engine' / 'eliminate legal hallucinations' marketing language in the Overview and the repeated '29+ jurisdictions' phrasing could be trimmed. Not 5 because the Overview spends tokens on positioning rather than instruction. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, runnable CLI commands ('lex search <query>', 'lex get <path>', 'lex draft "Czech house sale contract"', 'lex verify') plus a real template path ('templates/02_employment_workforce.md'). Not 5 because the 'lex' CLI itself is never established as provided or installed (no scripts/ bundle exists), so the commands are not guaranteed executable from the skill alone. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (identify jurisdiction → search & fetch → draft → verify authority) with a verification checkpoint at the end ('lex verify' producing a 'Verified Sources' section). Not 5 because there is no error-recovery or feedback loop (e.g., what to do when no template matches or verification finds no source), and the boundary case (outside US/EU/CA) is handled only in Best Practices. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clear sections (Overview, When to Use, How It Works, Examples, Best Practices, Common Pitfalls, Related Skills) with no inlined bulk content and no buried references; template detail is appropriately delegated to the CLI rather than inlined. Not 5 because the ~60-line body slightly exceeds the simple-skill threshold and the template catalog it indexes is never disclosed or linked, leaving navigation to blind 'lex search'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |