CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

linux-shell-scripting

Provide production-ready shell script templates for common Linux system administration tasks including backups, monitoring, user management, log analysis, and automation. These scripts serve as building blocks for security operations and penetration testing environments.

43

Quality

44%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/linux-shell-scripting/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is linux-shell-scripting in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

39%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is an extensive but poorly organized collection of basic shell script templates that Claude largely already knows how to write. The content suffers from significant verbosity, lack of workflow structure, missing validation/error handling for destructive operations, and a monolithic format that should be split across multiple files. While the scripts themselves are executable and syntactically correct, the skill adds minimal value beyond what Claude can generate from its training.

Suggestions

Split the 20+ scripts into separate bundle files organized by category (backup.md, monitoring.md, security.md, etc.) with SKILL.md serving as a concise overview and navigation hub.

Add explicit validation and error-handling steps to destructive scripts (backup rotation, data cleanup, remote operations) — e.g., dry-run flags, confirmation prompts, and exit-on-error patterns.

Remove the prerequisites, quick reference tables, and basic command explanations — Claude already knows shebang lines, chmod, cron format, and basic bash concepts.

Focus on non-obvious patterns and gotchas rather than straightforward scripts — e.g., proper credential handling, signal trapping, lock files for concurrent execution, and idempotency patterns.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is severely bloated at 400+ lines, presenting 20+ script templates that are largely basic patterns Claude already knows. The prerequisites section explains basic bash scripting and Linux filesystem concepts unnecessarily, and the quick reference tables cover elementary knowledge like shebang lines and chmod. Much of this content is padding rather than novel instruction.

2 / 5

Actionability

The scripts are concrete, executable, and copy-paste ready with proper bash syntax. However, many use placeholder paths ('/path/to/source') without guidance on parameterization, and the database backup script hardcodes credentials in plaintext without noting this as a security concern. The scripts are functional but lack error handling patterns.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 'phases' are arbitrary groupings of independent scripts, not a coherent workflow. There are no validation checkpoints, no error recovery steps, and no feedback loops. The backup rotation script uses 'rm -r' without confirmation, and the data cleanup script uses 'find -exec rm' on potentially important files—both destructive operations with zero validation. The destructive operations cap applies here.

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

All content is inlined in a single monolithic file with no references to supporting files. The 20+ scripts across 10 phases would benefit enormously from being split into separate files (e.g., backup-scripts.md, monitoring-scripts.md). There is no bundle structure despite the content clearly warranting one.

2 / 5

Total

10

/

20

Passed

Description

50%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear domain (Linux sysadmin shell scripts) and lists relevant task categories, but lacks concrete action specificity and an explicit 'Use when...' clause. The mention of penetration testing feels tacked on and could create confusion about the skill's primary purpose, reducing distinctiveness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with trigger phrases like 'Use when the user asks for bash scripts, shell scripts, Linux automation, server maintenance scripts, or .sh templates.'

Replace broad categories with concrete actions, e.g., 'Creates incremental backup scripts, disk usage monitoring alerts, user provisioning scripts, and log rotation configurations.'

Clarify the relationship between sysadmin tasks and penetration testing, or remove the pen-testing reference if it's secondary, to reduce overlap risk with security-focused skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (shell scripts for Linux sysadmin) and lists several task categories (backups, monitoring, user management, log analysis, automation), but these are categories rather than concrete actions. It doesn't specify what the scripts actually do in detail (e.g., 'create incremental backup scripts', 'generate disk usage reports').

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is reasonably clear (provide shell script templates for sysadmin tasks), but there is no explicit 'when' clause. There's no 'Use when...' guidance telling Claude when to select this skill, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant keywords like 'shell script', 'Linux', 'backups', 'monitoring', 'user management', 'log analysis', but misses natural user phrases like 'bash script', 'cron job', 'sysadmin', '.sh', 'server maintenance', or 'system administration script'. The mention of 'penetration testing' adds a keyword but feels tangential.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of 'shell script templates' and 'Linux system administration' provides some distinctiveness, but the broad categories (backups, monitoring, automation) could overlap with general DevOps, infrastructure, or security skills. The addition of 'penetration testing environments' muddies the scope and could cause conflicts with security-focused skills.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (509 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.