CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

marketing-ideas

A comprehensive library of 139 marketing ideas and strategies for SaaS and software products.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/marketing-ideas/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured index-style skill body: concrete context-gathering steps, a prescriptive five-field output format, and clearly signaled one-level-deep references (both verified live). It earns consistent 4s across dimensions, held back from 5s by minor cross-index redundancy, implementation depth delegated almost entirely to external references, absolute-URL links, and the absence of an explicit confirmation loop before detailing chosen ideas.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense index-style navigation (a 17-row category table with idea numbers, short stage/budget/timeline lists) with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. It falls short of a 5 only through minor trim opportunities: the persona line 'You are a marketing strategist with a library of 139 proven marketing ideas', the inline summary of the guerrilla-marketing deep dive ('the direct-mail 3-rule framework... a named case library (WePay, Xero, Red Bull...)') that duplicates the reference file, and idea numbers repeated across three index views (category table, Implementation Tips, Top Ideas by Use Case). It is above a 3 because the redundancy is structured navigation, not padded prose or over-explanation.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: 'If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename...), read it before asking questions', the numbered process 'Ask about their product, audience, and current stage if not clear / Suggest 3-5 most relevant ideas', and a prescriptive output format ('How to start: First 2-3 implementation steps', 'Resources needed: Time, budget, skills required'). Not a 5 because implementation depth for roughly 137 of the 139 ideas lives only in the external references file; the body alone deep-links a single idea (#121).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a clear precondition ('Check for product marketing context first... only ask for information not already covered') and a well-defined four-step sequence (ask about context → suggest 3-5 ideas → provide implementation details → consider resources), with the conditional 'if not clear' acting as a checkpoint. Not a 5 because there is no explicit feedback loop (e.g., confirming which chosen ideas to detail); not a 3 because the sequence is explicitly numbered with clear preconditions rather than implicit, and the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply to this advisory skill.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview index with two clearly signaled, one-level-deep references ('**For the complete list with descriptions**: See [references/ideas-by-category.md]' and '**Deep dives**... **Guerrilla marketing (#121)**: [references/guerrilla-marketing.md]'), both verified to exist at the linked URLs. Not a 5 because the references resolve only via absolute GitHub URLs rather than in-bundle relative paths, and the secondary index views (~55 lines of Implementation Tips, ~20 lines of Top Ideas by Use Case) could be split into reference files to keep SKILL.md a purer overview; not a 3 because the references are explicitly labeled and easy to navigate, not buried.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly communicates the domain and scope (139 marketing ideas/strategies for SaaS and software products) and is mostly distinguishable from sibling skills, but it is a static noun phrase with no action verbs, no 'Use when' trigger guidance, and few natural trigger variations — capping completeness at 3 and holding specificity to 2.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause to the description, e.g.: 'Use when the user asks for marketing ideas, growth strategies, or promotion tactics for their SaaS or software product' — this lifts completeness above its cap and adds the missing natural trigger phrasing.

Rewrite the noun phrase in third-person action form, e.g.: 'Suggests and details marketing ideas matched to a product's stage, budget, and resources' — this supplies the concrete actions that specificity currently lacks.

Include common user variations such as 'growth ideas', 'marketing tactics', or 'go-to-market' alongside 'marketing ideas and strategies' to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description 'A comprehensive library of 139 marketing ideas and strategies for SaaS and software products' names the domain and scale precisely but contains no action verbs at all — it describes a resource rather than what the skill does. It is not a 1 because the domain and scope are explicit ('139', 'SaaS and software products'), and not a 3 because that anchor requires 1-2 concrete actions, which are absent ('comprehensive' is self-praise, not an action).

2 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear and specific (a library of 139 marketing ideas and strategies for SaaS and software products), but the 'when' is entirely absent — there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. It is above a 2 because the 'what' is concrete rather than vague, and below a 4 because no explicit 'when' exists at all.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases are present ('marketing ideas', 'strategies', 'SaaS', 'software products') but common variations are missing — notably 'growth ideas', which the skill's own When-to-Use section identifies as a phrase users ask for, plus 'marketing tactics', 'promotion', and 'go-to-market'. This matches anchor 3 (some relevant keywords, missing common variations) rather than 4, since the gap exceeds 'a few natural terms missing' for a domain spanning 139 ideas across many sub-topics.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The qualifiers 'for SaaS and software products' and the specific framing of an ideas library (139 items) carve a mostly distinct niche — comparable to anchor 4's 'Works with PDF and Word document files' level of differentiation. It is not a 5 because the description carries no trigger differentiation against closely related sibling skills listed in the body (marketing-plan, programmatic-seo, emails, referrals), so a query like 'marketing strategies' could match several of them.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 2 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Path

skills/marketing-ideas/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.