marketing-ideas

A comprehensive library of 139 marketing ideas and strategies for SaaS and software products.

Quality

54%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/marketing-ideas/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable: it indexes 139 ideas across category/stage/budget/use-case views, defines a concrete recommendation workflow with an explicit output format, and pushes detail into clearly signaled one-level references. Main weaknesses are redundancy across the by-stage/by-budget/by-timeline/by-use-case grids and a single deep-dive reference.

Suggestions

Consolidate the overlapping 'By Stage', 'By Budget', 'By Timeline', and 'Top Ideas by Use Case' grids — the same idea numbers recur across them — to cut redundancy and tokens.

Link more deep-dive references (not just guerrilla-marketing.md) so progressive disclosure is consistent across categories, or note explicitly that others are inline in ideas-by-category.md.

Use repo-relative link paths (references/ideas-by-category.md) instead of absolute GitHub URLs so links resolve in the local bundle.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient — a compact category table, stage/budget/timeline grids, and short use-case lists — but sections like 'Implementation Tips' and 'Top Ideas by Use Case' overlap heavily (the same idea numbers recur across multiple grids), adding padding that could be tightened.	3 / 5
Actionability	It gives concrete, copy-ready guidance: a numbered question flow, idea-number references, an explicit output-format spec with five required fields, and a real deep-dive reference (guerrilla-marketing.md with a named 3-rule framework and case library).	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The 'When asked for marketing ideas' list and output format give a clear sequenced workflow with a context-checking first step, and the 'Why it fits / How to start / Expected outcome' structure acts as a per-idea checklist; it stops short of explicit validate/retry checkpoints, but the task is advisory rather than destructive so no cap applies.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Structure is good: SKILL.md serves as an overview/index with one-level-deep references signaled via markdown links (ideas-by-category.md, guerrilla-marketing.md), and inline content is kept to quick-reference tables. The GitHub-absolute URLs are slightly awkward and only one deep-dive is linked, keeping it just below a 5.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

41%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is niche and reasonably distinctive but vague on actions: it advertises a library rather than concrete things Claude does, and omits any 'Use when...' trigger guidance. Specificity and trigger-term coverage are the weakest aspects.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural user phrases (e.g. 'Use when the user asks for growth ideas, marketing strategies, or tactics for their SaaS').

Replace 'A comprehensive library of' with concrete actions Claude takes (e.g. 'Suggests and details marketing ideas for SaaS products').

Include natural synonyms users say — 'growth ideas', 'marketing tactics', 'go-to-market ideas' — to improve trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain (marketing ideas/strategies for SaaS and software) but the only 'action' is possessing a 'comprehensive library' — it describes a collection rather than concrete actions Claude performs.	2 / 5
Completeness	It states clearly 'what' (a library of 139 marketing ideas and strategies for SaaS/software) but has no 'when' / 'Use when' trigger clause, so completeness caps at 3 per the rubric.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	It includes 'marketing ideas' and 'strategies' but lacks the natural phrases users actually say ('growth ideas', 'marketing tactics') and any file-format-like synonyms; keyword coverage is generic.	2 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It is scoped to SaaS and software products with a distinct 139-idea niche, making overlap risk low; it loses a point only because the description itself is broad enough to brush against a general marketing-plan skill.	4 / 5
	Total	11 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 2 missing	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Path: skills/marketing-ideas/SKILL.md
Commit: 57c135b

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.