CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

microsoft-teams-automation

Automate Microsoft Teams tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): send messages, manage channels, create meetings, handle chats, and search messages. Always search tools first for current schemas.

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

The canonical home for this skill is microsoft-teams-automation in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable, well-sequenced content that consistently provides exact tool names, parameters, formats, and error-handling guidance. Its main weaknesses are moderate redundancy across the Pitfalls and Known Pitfalls sections and a filler closing sentence.

Suggestions

Consolidate pagination and ID-format guidance into the single 'Known Pitfalls' section and remove their repetition from individual workflow Pitfalls lists.

Delete the filler closing line 'This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.'

Consider moving the 16-row Quick Reference table into a reference file or trimming it to the highest-frequency tools to reduce token cost.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense with tool sequences, parameters, and pitfalls, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but pitfalls repeat across sections (pagination appears three times, ID formats appear in both workflow pitfalls and 'Known Pitfalls') and the closing line 'This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview' is filler — minor waste fitting anchor 4.

4 / 5

Actionability

Exact tool slugs, parameter names, concrete ID format examples ('19:...@thread.tacv2', UUID), ISO 8601 time examples, and specific error-handling guidance (429 → exponential backoff 1s/2s/4s) give copy-paste-ready guidance covering common cases — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Five workflows are clearly sequenced with [Prerequisite]/[Required]/[Optional] markers, setup verification is explicit ('Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows'), and error recovery is covered (429 backoff, 403 permissions, 404 wrong IDs); a minor gap is the lack of an explicit post-send verification checkpoint for message posting.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A well-organized single-file skill with clear section headers; no bundle files exist and runtime schemas come from RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS, so no external references are strictly needed, but everything is inline — including a 16-row quick-reference table — leaving minor organization gaps relative to anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with concrete, comprehensive action coverage and a clear niche, undermined by the complete absence of a 'Use when...' trigger clause. Adding explicit trigger guidance would raise it to the top anchor tier.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to send Teams messages, post to channels, schedule Teams meetings, or search Teams chat history.'

Include natural trigger synonyms such as 'schedule a meeting', 'post to a channel', and 'direct message' to broaden keyword coverage.

Keep the 'Always search tools first' note — it is useful operational guidance — but move or rephrase it so it reads as usage guidance rather than replacing a trigger clause.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists five concrete actions ('send messages, manage channels, create meetings, handle chats, and search messages') within the named Teams domain, matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor rather than the minor-gaps anchor 4.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is explicit and concrete, but 'Always search tools first for current schemas' is a usage instruction rather than a trigger clause — no 'Use when...' or equivalent trigger guidance exists, which caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like 'Microsoft Teams', 'send messages', 'channels', and 'create meetings' map directly to what users say, but a few natural variants (e.g., 'schedule a meeting', 'post to a channel', 'direct message') are missing, placing it between anchors 4 and 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Automate Microsoft Teams tasks via Rube MCP (Composio)' carves a clear niche distinct from Slack/Discord/generic messaging skills, with domain-specific triggers carrying minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Path

plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/microsoft-teams-automation/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.