Content
56%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill provides a comprehensive overview of Miro automation via Rube MCP with good structural organization and clear workflow sequencing. However, it suffers from redundancy (pitfalls repeated across sections), lacks concrete executable examples (no actual tool call payloads shown), and could benefit from splitting detailed reference material into separate files. The instruction to 'always search tools first for current schemas' somewhat undermines the value of the detailed parameter listings.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete, complete tool call example with actual parameter payloads (e.g., a full MIRO_CREATE_STICKY_NOTE_ITEM call) rather than just listing parameter names.
Consolidate the per-workflow 'Pitfalls' sections into the single 'Known Pitfalls' section to eliminate redundancy and reduce token count.
Remove or significantly trim parameter listings since the skill instructs users to always call RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS first for current schemas—the duplicated schema info wastes tokens.
Remove the vacuous 'When to Use' section at the bottom, which adds no information beyond what the title and description already convey.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is moderately efficient but contains notable redundancy. The 'Known Pitfalls' section repeats information already stated in per-workflow pitfall sections (e.g., board ID resolution, item creation fields). The 'When to Use' footer is vacuous. Some parameter listings could be trimmed since the skill itself says to always check current schemas via RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The skill provides tool names, parameter lists, and sequences, but lacks executable code examples or concrete payloads. The 'Common Patterns' section uses pseudocode-style numbered lists rather than actual tool call examples with real parameter structures. Key operations like creating connectors list parameters but don't show a complete tool invocation. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows are clearly sequenced with labeled steps, prerequisite/required/optional annotations, and pitfall warnings. The setup section includes a verification step (confirm ACTIVE status). However, there are no explicit validation or error-recovery feedback loops after item creation or sharing operations—e.g., no 'verify the sticky note was created' step. Since these aren't destructive/batch operations in the traditional sense, this doesn't trigger the cap at 3, but it's still a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections and a quick reference table, but it's a long monolithic file (~180 lines) with no bundle files or external references. The repeated pitfalls sections and detailed parameter listings for each workflow could be split into separate reference files. For a skill of this complexity, some content (e.g., full parameter details, coordinate system docs) would benefit from being in supplementary files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |