Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, largely actionable mobile design playbook with concrete code, thresholds, and a sequenced workflow gated by validation checkpoints. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it mandates six reference files that are not present in the bundle and inlines content that belongs in those separate files.
Suggestions
Create the referenced files (mobile-design-thinking.md, touch-psychology.md, mobile-performance.md, mobile-backend.md, mobile-testing.md, mobile-debugging.md, platform-ios.md, platform-android.md) under references/, or remove the REQUIRED references and inline only the essentials.
Move the detailed anti-pattern tables and platform default matrices into the corresponding reference files, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep links.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop around the release-readiness checklist so failed checklist items route back to remediation rather than just being ticked.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean tables, concrete do/don't mappings, and code, with no explanations of basic concepts; the only padding is the brief 'Philosophy / Core Law / Operating Rule' motivational block and repeated emoji emphasis, matching the 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides executable code (React Native FlatList with memo/useCallback, Flutter const widget), concrete numeric thresholds (44/48px, 60fps), and concrete fix mappings for every anti-pattern; minor gaps are the trivial Flutter example and one-line framework decision tree, matching 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code with minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence exists (MFRI assess → mandatory ask/read → checkpoint → release checklist) with validation gates ('MFRI ≥ 3', 'Cannot complete → go back and read'), matching the 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present' anchor; not 5 because error-recovery feedback loops beyond the checkpoint are thin. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is good and reference tables are clearly signaled, but the six REQUIRED reference .md files cited in the body do not exist as bundle files (no references/ directory — only scripts/mobile_audit.py), and large platform/anti-pattern catalogs are inlined rather than split out, matching the 'Some structure but could be better organized; references present but content that should be separate is inline' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |