Name: multiplayer
Rating: 48 (1 reviews)
Author: administrakt0r

Blog Docs Log in Get started

multiplayer

Multiplayer game development principles. Architecture, networking, synchronization.

Quality

51%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/game-development/multiplayer/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is multiplayer in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Quality

Content

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured reference of multiplayer networking principles with concise tables and a useful decision tree, but it mostly re-states concepts Claude already knows and lacks executable steps or a real workflow with validation checkpoints. It is solidly average rather than exemplary.

Suggestions

Trim explanations of concepts Claude already knows (e.g. the "Server Authority" validation block and the closing "Remember" blockquote) and keep only novel decision guidance.

Replace the vague "When to Use" line with a concrete trigger and a short step sequence Claude should follow when the skill is invoked.

Add at least one executable artifact (e.g. a sample authoritative-server validation snippet or a command to test update rates) to lift actionability above the design-directive level.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean tables and a decision tree, but it largely restates well-known networking/game concepts Claude already knows (prediction, interpolation, delta compression, anti-cheat basics) and ends with a redundant "Remember" blockquote, matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 5
Actionability	Concrete design directives and a selection decision tree are present, but there are no executable implementation steps, code, or commands, and the "When to Use" line is vague filler, fitting the score-3 anchor with incomplete guidance.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Numbered sections and the architecture decision tree give an implicit reading order and selection procedure, but there is no explicit multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints, so it fits the score-3 anchor.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is a single well-organized file with clear numbered sections and no nested references, but at ~130 lines with all reference material inline it is not a 5, matching the score-4 anchor.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly names a distinct niche and its subtopics but omits any concrete actions and any "when to use" trigger guidance, capping both specificity and completeness. Adding concrete verbs and a "Use when..." clause would substantially raise the score.

Suggestions

Add concrete action verbs to the description, e.g. "Design, implement, and optimize multiplayer game networking and synchronization."

Append an explicit trigger clause such as "Use when building multiplayer or online games, or when the user mentions netcode, lag compensation, or game servers."

Include natural synonyms users say ("online game", "netcode", "lag") to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain and three subtopics ("Multiplayer game development principles. Architecture, networking, synchronization.") but contains zero concrete action verbs, so it sits between the score-1 (vague) and score-2 (domain named, minimal actions) anchors.	2 / 5
Completeness	It provides a topic-level "what" but no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so per the rubric cap completeness cannot exceed 3 and fits the score-3 anchor.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	"Multiplayer game development" plus "networking" and "synchronization" are relevant natural phrases, but common variations users say (online game, netcode, lag, game server) are missing, matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The multiplayer-game niche is clearly distinct with minor overlap risk against general game-development skills, matching the score-4 anchor; it is not a 5 because no explicit triggers are given.	4 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Path: plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/game-development/multiplayer/SKILL.md
Commit: 57c135b

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.