CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

nanobanana-ppt-skills

AI-powered PPT generation with document analysis and styled images

28

Quality

21%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/nanobanana-ppt-skills/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is nanobanana-ppt-skills in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

7%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is essentially an empty placeholder. It repeats its one-line description three times and provides no actionable content whatsoever — no code, no commands, no workflow, no examples, and no meaningful references. It would be entirely useless to Claude in performing the described task.

Suggestions

Add concrete, executable code or commands showing how to generate PPT files (e.g., using python-pptx or relevant tools), including document analysis and image styling steps.

Define a clear multi-step workflow: e.g., 1) Analyze input document, 2) Generate slide structure, 3) Create styled images, 4) Assemble PPT, 5) Validate output.

Remove the redundant repetition of the description and replace the 'When to Use' and 'Instructions' sections with actual actionable guidance, examples, and constraints.

If detailed content exists in the linked GitHub repository, either inline the key instructions or create bundle files and reference them with clear navigation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is extremely thin yet still manages to be redundant — the description 'AI-powered PPT generation with document analysis and styled images' is repeated three times verbatim across the overview, 'when to use', and instructions sections, adding no value.

2 / 5

Actionability

There is zero concrete guidance — no code, no commands, no steps, no examples, no specific instructions. The entire body is a vague placeholder that tells Claude nothing about how to actually generate PPTs.

1 / 5

Workflow Clarity

No workflow, steps, or sequence of any kind is provided. There are no validation checkpoints or any indication of what the process involves.

1 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

There is no meaningful content to structure, no bundle files, and the only reference is an external GitHub link with no indication of what it contains. There is no navigation or organization of any substance.

1 / 5

Total

5

/

20

Passed

Description

36%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is too terse and vague, relying on buzzwords like 'AI-powered' without specifying concrete actions or when the skill should be triggered. It names the general domain (PPT generation) but fails to enumerate specific capabilities or include a 'Use when...' clause. Key trigger terms like 'presentation', 'PowerPoint', 'slides', and '.pptx' are missing.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit trigger phrases such as 'Use when the user asks to create presentations, PowerPoint files, slide decks, or .pptx documents'.

Replace 'AI-powered' with concrete actions like 'Creates slide decks from documents, generates styled images for slides, applies layouts and themes'.

Include natural synonyms and file extensions: 'presentation', 'PowerPoint', 'slides', 'deck', '.pptx' to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (PPT generation) and mentions 'document analysis' and 'styled images' but these are vague and not concrete actions. No specific operations like 'create slides', 'add speaker notes', 'insert charts' are mentioned.

2 / 5

Completeness

Has a vague 'what' (PPT generation with document analysis and styled images) but completely lacks any 'when' clause or trigger guidance. The missing 'Use when...' clause caps this at 3 per the rubric, and the 'what' is itself quite vague, bringing it to 2.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes 'PPT' which is a natural keyword users would say, and 'document analysis' and 'images' are somewhat relevant. However, it's missing common synonyms and variations like 'presentation', 'PowerPoint', '.pptx', 'slides', 'deck'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of PPT generation + document analysis + styled images provides some specificity, but 'document analysis' is broad and could overlap with many other skills. The 'AI-powered' prefix is meaningless fluff that doesn't aid distinction.

3 / 5

Total

10

/

20

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.