Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill: the workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit selector-verification checkpoints and error-recovery feedback loops, and content is appropriately split across six real, one-level-deep reference files. The only weaknesses are minor — a duplicated reference link, some redundancy between step 3 and the verification rules section, and a stubbed inline JSON example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but has minor trims available: [references/analysis-workflow.md] is linked twice in step 3, and the selector-verification rules in step 3's actions are restated nearly verbatim in the separate "Selector Verification Rules" section ("Never guess selectors" appears in both). This matches the level-4 anchor ("Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed") rather than level 5's every-token-earns-its-place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable throughout: "Read `Bases/*.base` to find a matching category", "Use **WebFetch** to retrieve page content", "Analyze the HTML for Schema.org JSON, Meta tags, and CSS selectors", with fallbacks (browser DOM snapshot, ask for another URL). The minor gap is the inline JSON example, which is a stub ending in "..." rather than a complete copy-paste-ready template, deferring instead to references and assets — level 4 ("Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps"), not level 5's fully executable examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced (identify intent → check Bases → fetch and analyze → draft JSON → consider logic → verify variables) with explicit validation checkpoints ("Verify each selector against the fetched content. Do not guess selectors") and genuine feedback loops for error recovery ("If a selector cannot be verified from the fetched content, state that explicitly and ask for another URL", plus a dedicated Selector Verification Rules section). This matches the level-5 anchor ("Clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery"); template creation is not a destructive or batch operation, so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a lean overview with every topic split into one of six verified reference files (variables, filters, json-schema, logic, bases-workflow, analysis-workflow, each 44-79 lines) plus two example assets, all existing on disk and cross-linked only as siblings — no nested chains. All references are clearly signaled both inline at the relevant workflow step and in the Resources section with one-line descriptions, matching the level-5 anchor ("Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; content appropriately split; easy navigation"). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |