Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and actionable with copy-paste XML examples and well-organized sections, but its workflow lacks an explicit validation/feedback step for the XML it generates. Adding a verify-render step would raise the weakest dimension.
Suggestions
Add a verification step to the workflow, e.g. 'Validate: install the module and render the report to confirm the QWeb compiles; fix directive errors and re-render.'
Include a short email-template or website-page QWeb example so all capabilities named in the description are demonstrated.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes QWeb competence; the explanatory bits (t-out vs t-esc, _lt()) are Odoo-specific gotchas rather than generic padding, with only minor trimmable phrasing. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready XML for a full ir.actions.report record and QWeb template plus a conditional-rendering snippet, but examples for email templates and website pages (mentioned in the description) are absent, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How It Works' section gives a clear 3-step sequence (Activate, Generate, Debug) but includes no validation or verification checkpoint; because QWeb is XML manipulation, the rubric caps workflow clarity at 3 without a feedback loop. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is self-contained with well-organized sections (Overview, When to Use, How It Works, Examples, Best Practices, Limitations) and no external references are needed, though it is slightly over 50 lines so it does not fully hit the simple-skill 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |