Content
61%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A solid QWeb templating skill with good concrete examples and well-targeted best practices that provide genuine value. The main weaknesses are unnecessary introductory/meta content that Claude doesn't need, and a lack of validation/debugging workflow despite claiming debugging as a use case. Trimming the preamble and adding a concrete debugging example or validation step would significantly improve it.
Suggestions
Remove or drastically shorten the 'Overview', 'When to Use This Skill', and 'How It Works' sections — Claude already knows what QWeb is and doesn't need activation instructions.
Add a concrete debugging example showing a common QWeb error (e.g., missing t-as) and its fix, since debugging is listed as a use case.
Add a brief validation step, such as how to test-render a report from the Odoo shell or UI to verify the template works before deployment.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 'Overview' and 'When to Use This Skill' sections explain things Claude already knows (what QWeb is, when to use templates). The 'How It Works' section describes activation steps that are meta-instructions rather than actionable content. The examples and best practices sections are well-targeted, but the surrounding content adds unnecessary padding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The XML examples are concrete and copy-paste ready, showing a complete report action and QWeb template. The best practices provide specific, actionable guidance (e.g., t-field vs t-out vs t-esc). Minor gap: no example of a _get_report_values() helper or email template, and no example of t-foreach with a child collection (only the top-level docs loop is shown). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is primarily a single-task skill (generating QWeb templates), so a complex workflow isn't strictly required. However, the 'How It Works' section describes a 3-step process (Activate, Generate, Debug) that is vague and not actionable. There are no validation steps — e.g., how to test the report renders correctly, or how to debug common rendering errors despite claiming debugging capability. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections (Overview, Examples, Best Practices, Limitations). For a standalone skill with no bundle files, the length is reasonable and sections are logically organized. Minor issue: the Limitations section effectively signals scope boundaries, acting as implicit pointers to other knowledge areas, but no actual references to companion files exist. For a skill of this size without bundle files, this is acceptable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |