Content
18%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a placeholder that defers all meaningful content to a resource file that doesn't exist in the bundle. The body contains no concrete guidance, no executable examples, no workflow steps, and no OpenAPI-specific patterns. It reads as a generic template rather than a skill that would help Claude generate or validate OpenAPI specifications.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable examples showing how to structure an OpenAPI 3.1 spec (e.g., a minimal spec with paths, schemas, and responses in YAML/JSON).
Define a clear workflow with validation steps, e.g.: 1. Identify endpoints → 2. Define schemas → 3. Write paths → 4. Validate with a linter command → 5. Fix errors and re-validate.
Replace the generic instruction bullets ('Clarify goals', 'Apply best practices') with OpenAPI-specific actionable guidance such as naming conventions, $ref usage patterns, and common pitfalls.
Either provide the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` bundle file or inline the essential patterns directly in the SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 'Use this skill when' and 'Do not use this skill when' sections add moderate padding without providing actionable value. The instructions section is generic and could apply to almost any skill. However, it's not excessively verbose overall. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The content provides no concrete code, commands, examples, or specific guidance for generating OpenAPI specs. Instructions like 'Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs' and 'Apply relevant best practices' are entirely vague and non-actionable. Everything is deferred to a resource file that doesn't exist in the bundle. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no defined workflow, no sequenced steps, and no validation checkpoints. The four bullet points in Instructions are generic platitudes rather than a meaningful process. For a skill involving spec generation and validation, this is critically insufficient. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references `resources/implementation-playbook.md` for detailed patterns, which is a reasonable disclosure strategy. However, no bundle files are provided, meaning the reference leads nowhere. The SKILL.md itself contains almost no substantive content to serve as an overview, making the disclosure structure hollow. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 7 / 20 Passed |