CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

pagerduty-automation

Automate PagerDuty tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage incidents, services, schedules, escalation policies, and on-call rotations. Always search tools first for current schemas.

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/pagerduty-automation/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is pagerduty-automation in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, highly actionable MCP reference with concrete tool sequences, parameters, and pitfalls, but it is a monolithic file with redundant sections, filler text, and no validation feedback loops for destructive operations.

Suggestions

Add verify-after-action feedback loops for destructive/batch operations (e.g., confirm incident status after update, list overrides after delete) to raise workflow clarity.

Move the per-workflow tool catalog and Quick Reference table into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview pointing to it.

Cut the redundant Quick Reference table and the filler "When to Use" section; replace the latter with a concrete description of when each workflow applies.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense reference material without concept over-explanation, but the Quick Reference table duplicates tool slugs already listed in the workflows, the "When to Use" section is filler ("This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview."), and the ID Resolution patterns spell out obvious steps.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact tool names, required/optional flags per step, key parameters, and pitfalls with specifics like "requires a `service` object with both `id` and `type: 'service_reference'`" and "Snooze duration is in seconds"; it correctly delegates current schemas to RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS rather than fabricating them. Falls short of 5 only for lacking example request payloads for common cases.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Setup has an explicit validation checkpoint ("Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE") and schedules advise preview-before-save, but destructive/batch operations (update incident, delete schedule override, resolve, disable) have no verify-after-action feedback loops, which caps workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, so the entire per-workflow tool catalog and Quick Reference table are inlined in a single ~240-line SKILL.md. Section structure is good, but content that clearly belongs in a separate reference file is inline, matching the "could be better organized" anchor.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-scoped description with strong domain keywords and low conflict risk, but it lacks any explicit "when to use" trigger clause and misses common natural trigger phrases like "alerts" and "paging".

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the user mentions PagerDuty, incidents, alerts, on-call rotations, or paging."

Include common user phrasings as trigger terms ("alerts", "paging", "who's on call") to broaden natural-language matching.

Replace the generic "manage"/"automate tasks" verbs with distinct concrete actions (create, acknowledge, resolve incidents) for fuller coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"manage incidents, services, schedules, escalation policies, and on-call rotations" lists several concrete capability areas, though verbs like "manage" and "automate tasks" are generic rather than distinct concrete actions, keeping it short of comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear and concrete, but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance; "Always search tools first for current schemas" is an operating instruction, not a when-to-use statement, which caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage — "PagerDuty", "incidents", "on-call", "escalation policies", "schedules" — but misses common user phrasings such as "alerts", "paging", "notify", or "who's on call".

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"PagerDuty" plus "Rube MCP (Composio)" defines a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal risk of firing for the wrong skill.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Path

plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/pagerduty-automation/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.