Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-formatted, mostly actionable planning framework whose main weaknesses are redundancy across three overlapping sections (breakdown principles, planning principles, best practices) and an internal contradiction about whether plans should have phases. The absence of a sequenced authoring workflow and the dangling script references leave modest gaps in workflow clarity and actionability.
Suggestions
Collapse 'Task Breakdown Principles', 'Planning Principles', and 'Best Practices (Quick Reference)' into a single section — they repeatedly state the same small/specific/verifiable-task guidance, which would cut the body by roughly a third.
Resolve the phase contradiction: either remove '**Phase X: Verification is always LAST**' from 'Logical Ordering' or drop 'No phases, no sub-sections unless truly needed' from the Plan Structure section so the guidance is consistent.
Clarify the script table: either bundle the referenced scripts (ux_audit.py, api_validator.py, etc.) or rephrase them as generic categories (e.g., 'a UX/accessibility audit script') since no scripts/ directory exists in this skill bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body restates the same guidance across three parallel sections — 'Task Breakdown Principles' ('Each task should take 2-5 minutes... Independently verifiable'), 'Principle 1: Keep It SHORT' ('5-10 clear tasks max'), and 'Best Practices' ('Max 10 tasks... Each task verifiable') — and 'When to Use' repeats the frontmatter description. The table format is efficient, but whole-section duplication means it could be meaningfully tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete contrast pairs like '"Add authentication"' → '"Install next-auth, create /api/auth/[...nextauth].ts"', '"Run npx create-next-app"', and '"curl localhost:3000/api/users returns 200"' give mostly executable guidance. Minor gaps: the project-type script table references scripts (ux_audit.py, security_scan.py) that have no corresponding files in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body presents principles rather than a sequenced authoring workflow, and contains an internal contradiction: 'Logical Ordering' mandates '**Phase X: Verification is always LAST**' while the Plan Structure section says 'No phases, no sub-sections unless truly needed.' Per-task verification checkpoints exist ('→ Verify: [How to check]') but the plan-creation process itself lacks ordered steps or checkpoints. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~145-line body is well-sectioned with clear headers, contrast tables, and a plan template, with no nested or buried references — matching good single-file organization. It does not qualify for the simple-skill exception (under 50 lines), and the script-selection table references files absent from the bundle, keeping it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |