Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-organized instruction set for web research with a clear workflow and concrete technique pointers. Its main weaknesses are the absence of worked query examples and a dangling reference to a playbook file that does not exist.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 worked query examples showing exact syntax (e.g. `"exact phrase" -exclude site:arxiv.org after:2024`) to lift actionability.
Fix or remove the broken reference: the body points to `resources/implementation-playbook.md` but no such file (or `references/` directory) exists — either create it under `references/` or drop the line.
Tighten the generic 'Instructions' boilerplate ('Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs', 'Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes') into search-specific steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned with no padding about what search engines or libraries are; the only minor trimmable bits are generic boilerplate lines like 'Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.' | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It names concrete techniques ('Use specific phrases in quotes', 'Exclude irrelevant terms with negative keywords', 'allowed_domains for trusted sources', 'Create 3-5 query variations') but stops short of executable, worked examples of query syntax or tool invocations, leaving key details implied. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Approach' section gives a clear 5-step sequence (understand → vary queries → broad-then-refine → verify facts → track contradictions) with verification built into steps 4-5, but lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop or checklist for a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear sections appropriate for a simple skill; the single external reference ('open resources/implementation-playbook.md') is well-signaled but points to a non-existent file and uses 'resources' rather than the conventional 'references' path, a minor navigation gap rather than a structural failure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |