CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

segment-automation

Automate Segment tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): track events, identify users, manage groups, page views, aliases, batch operations. Always search tools first for current schemas.

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/segment-automation/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is segment-automation in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, actionable reference for Segment operations with good navigation, but it is held back by repetition across the pitfalls sections and a missing validation checkpoint before the irreversible ALIAS call.

Suggestions

Add a pre-execution validation step for the destructive ALIAS workflow (e.g. confirm previousId resolves to an existing anonymous user before calling SEGMENT_ALIAS, since it cannot be undone).

Remove the duplicated pitfalls between each workflow's 'Pitfalls' block and the global 'Known Pitfalls' section, keeping each in one place.

Provide at least one concrete example tool invocation (with argument shape) for SEGMENT_TRACK and SEGMENT_BATCH so the guidance is copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient reference material, but the 'Known Pitfalls' section repeats per-workflow pitfalls (e.g. 'Always include userId or anonymousId') and the closing 'When to Use' line is filler, so it could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete tool slugs, required/optional parameter lists, and tool sequences give mostly executable guidance, though it stops short of copy-paste-ready call examples.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sequences and a connection-status checkpoint are present and the batch pattern checks for per-message errors, but the destructive, irreversible ALIAS operation has no pre-execution validation, so workflow clarity is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single self-contained file is well organized with clear sections and a Quick Reference table; no bundle files exist, so the one-level-deep reference criterion is not applicable, leaving only minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and well-scoped to Segment automation, listing concrete actions and a distinct integration path. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers, e.g. 'Use when sending events or user traits to Segment, managing Segment sources, or batching Segment calls.'

Include natural synonyms users say (e.g., 'send events to Segment', 'tag users') alongside the API verb names.

Drop or de-emphasize the implementation detail 'Always search tools first for current schemas' from the description and move it into the body, keeping the description trigger-focused.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The phrase 'track events, identify users, manage groups, page views, aliases, batch operations' lists multiple specific concrete Segment actions with comprehensive coverage, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does but lacks any 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance; per the judging guidelines a missing 'when' caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Action terms like 'track events' and 'identify users' are natural for Segment users, but the description leans technical ('Rube MCP (Composio)') and omits common synonyms and user-side phrasings, falling just short of comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the Segment platform plus the Rube MCP/Composio integration gives it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, though the action verbs overlap with general CDP terminology.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.