Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized and reasonably lean, with a clear analysis sequence and a useful output template. It is held back by missing validation checkpoints, abstract rather than executable density/LSI guidance, and a broken reference path.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation steps to the workflow, e.g. verify computed density against the 0.5-1.5% target and flag any over-optimization before finalizing output.
Fix the reference path to match the bundle (use 'references/implementation-playbook.md' or create the referenced file), or remove the reference if no detail file exists.
Provide a concrete method or small code snippet for calculating keyword density and extracting LSI candidates so guidance is directly executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Sections are short bullet lists and mostly token-efficient, though Focus Areas, Entity Analysis, and Approach overlap conceptually and the density guidelines mildly restate known practice; minor trimming would reach 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides specific density targets (0.5-1.5%), a numbered approach, and an output template with quantities, but no concrete method or code to compute density or generate LSI keywords, leaving key execution details implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Approach section gives a clear 7-step sequence, but there are no explicit validation/verification checkpoints for a batch analysis task; 'validate outcomes' is vague, so the cap applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into short sections, but the single reference points to 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' which does not exist in the bundle, so navigation is not clearly valid. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |