CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

seo-snippet-hunter

Formats content to be eligible for featured snippets and SERP features. Creates snippet-optimized content blocks based on best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for question-based content.

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/seo-snippet-hunter/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is seo-snippet-hunter in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-organized and provides concrete, actionable snippet-formatting guidance with a clear output template. Its weaknesses are generic boilerplate sections that dilute conciseness and a broken reference to a non-existent playbook file.

Suggestions

Remove the tautological boilerplate ('Use this skill when: Working on seo snippet hunter tasks', the generic 'Instructions' list, and the role-play sentence) to tighten conciseness.

Either create the referenced resources/implementation-playbook.md or drop the pointer, since the current reference leads to a missing file.

Move the Advanced Tactics, Platform Implementation, and full deliverables list into a separate reference file to improve progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The core snippet-type and format sections are reasonably efficient, but generic boilerplate ('Working on seo snippet hunter tasks or workflows', 'Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs', 'You are a featured snippet optimization specialist...') adds unnecessary padding, matching the mostly-efficient-but-could-tighten score-3 anchor.

3 / 5

Actionability

It gives concrete, specific guidance such as 'Paragraph Snippets (40-60 words)', 'Numbered steps (5-8 items)', a markdown output template, and named schema types (FAQPage, HowTo), which is mostly executable with only minor gaps, fitting score-4 rather than the fully copy-paste score-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 'Approach' section lays out a clear 7-step sequence from identifying questions to creating answer variations, and this content-generation task is non-destructive so missing validation checkpoints are minor gaps, matching score-4.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body has section structure and one signaled reference ('open resources/implementation-playbook.md'), but that referenced file does not exist in the bundle and substantial inline material (Advanced Tactics, Platform Implementation, full deliverables) could be split out, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys a focused SEO niche with an explicit use-when clause and decent trigger keywords. Its main weaknesses are slightly high-level action descriptions and a narrow, somewhat unspecific trigger condition.

Suggestions

Expand the 'what' with more concrete actions (e.g., 'drafts 40-60 word answer paragraphs, builds FAQ/HowTo schema markup, structures PAA pairs') to lift specificity toward 5.

Broaden the 'when' clause beyond 'question-based content' to cover explicit triggers like 'position zero', 'rich results', or 'PAA optimization'.

Add common synonyms/file or feature names (e.g., 'position zero', 'rich results') to improve trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ('featured snippets and SERP features') and two concrete actions ('Formats content to be eligible...', 'Creates snippet-optimized content blocks based on best practices'), but the actions are high-level and coverage is not comprehensive, matching the score-3 anchor rather than the multi-action score-4 anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It states a clear 'what' and an explicit 'when' ('Use PROACTIVELY for question-based content'), but the 'when' is narrow and could be more specific, fitting the score-4 anchor rather than the fully-explicit score-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like 'featured snippets', 'SERP features', and 'question-based content' give good keyword coverage a user would say, though common synonyms such as 'position zero' or 'rich results' are missing, placing it just below the comprehensive score-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The featured-snippet/SERP niche is mostly distinct with clear triggers, but it could overlap with broader SEO or content-formatting skills, matching score-4 rather than the minimal-conflict score-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.