Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill: concrete formats and templates throughout, verified one-level-deep references, and a clear implied workflow from context gathering to deliverables. Its main costs are a handful of URL/SEO basics Claude already knows and a near-duplicate question list in two sections.
Suggestions
Trim well-known URL hygiene rules (hyphens vs underscores, lowercase, descriptive anchor text) to a compact list, since Claude already knows these conventions.
Merge the "Task-Specific Questions" section with the "Before Planning" context checklist to remove the duplicated questions about site type, page count, and URLs to preserve.
Add an explicit numbered workflow (gather context -> propose hierarchy -> confirm with user -> produce the five deliverables) with a checkpoint to validate the draft hierarchy before generating full output.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with decision tables, rules, and templates rather than padded prose, but includes a few basics Claude already knows ("Hyphens, not underscores," "Lowercase always," "descriptive anchor text — not 'click here'") and duplicates context questions in both "Before Planning" and "Task-Specific Questions." Minor over-explanation that could be trimmed fits 4. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: copy-paste-ready ASCII tree format, two complete Mermaid graph TD diagrams, URL pattern tables by page type, a URL map table template, and an explicit five-deliverable output spec. Concrete formats cover the common site types end to end, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear implied sequence runs from the "Before Planning" context checkpoint through design sections to the "Output Format" deliverables, supported by a link-audit checklist. However, the workflow is section-implied rather than explicitly numbered, and there are no validation/feedback checkpoints (e.g., confirm the draft hierarchy with the user before full output), fitting 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-sectioned overview, and all three referenced files (site-type-templates.md, navigation-patterns.md, mermaid-templates.md) exist, are one level deep with no nested references, and are clearly signaled at the exact point of need ("For full page hierarchy templates: See [references/site-type-templates.md]"). Bulk templates are appropriately split out with key examples kept inline, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |