CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor

Use when working with tdd workflows tdd refactor

34

Quality

30%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

38%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill suffers from significant verbosity by cataloging knowledge Claude already possesses (SOLID principles, design patterns, code smells, refactoring techniques) rather than focusing on the unique workflow and tooling integration. The before/after code example is a strength, but the bulk of the content reads like a textbook chapter rather than actionable skill instructions. The referenced bundle file doesn't exist, and content that should be in separate reference files is inlined.

Suggestions

Remove or drastically condense the SOLID principles, design patterns, code smells, and refactoring techniques catalogs — Claude already knows these. Focus only on the specific workflow and tool integration.

Provide a concrete, complete example of the Task tool invocation with subagent_type='tdd-orchestrator', including expected input format and output structure.

Move reference material (pattern catalogs, technique lists) into the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` bundle file and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with the core workflow.

Tighten the workflow into a concrete numbered sequence with explicit validation gates, e.g., 'Step 1: Run tests → if any fail, stop. Step 2: Make one atomic change → Step 3: Run tests again → if fail, revert immediately.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is heavily padded with content Claude already knows well — SOLID principles definitions, design pattern catalogs, code smell taxonomies, and refactoring technique lists are all foundational knowledge that don't need enumeration. The extended thinking note and boilerplate 'Use/Do not use' sections add further bloat without value.

2 / 5

Actionability

The before/after TypeScript example is concrete and useful, and the Task tool invocation pattern provides some executable guidance. However, most of the content is catalog-style lists (code smells, patterns, principles) rather than specific executable steps. The actual mechanism ('Use Task tool with subagent_type="tdd-orchestrator"') is vaguely described with no concrete invocation example.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 10-step core process provides a sequence, and the recovery protocol and safety checklist add validation elements. However, the steps are broad categories rather than precise workflow steps, and the validation checkpoints (run tests after each change) are mentioned but not integrated into a tight feedback loop with explicit error handling at each stage. The recovery protocol is present but generic.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill references `resources/implementation-playbook.md` but no bundle files exist to support it. The massive amount of inline content (SOLID definitions, pattern catalogs, code smell lists, refactoring techniques) should clearly be in separate reference files rather than inlined. The skill is a monolithic document that would benefit greatly from splitting into overview + reference materials.

2 / 5

Total

10

/

20

Passed

Description

22%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description is extremely minimal and fails to communicate what the skill actually does. It only provides a vague 'when' trigger without any 'what' component, and the trigger terms, while somewhat relevant, lack breadth and synonyms. The description would be nearly useless for Claude to distinguish this skill from other coding or testing-related skills.

Suggestions

Add a clear 'what' clause describing concrete actions, e.g., 'Guides test-driven development by helping write failing tests first, implement minimal code to pass, and refactor for clean design.'

Expand trigger terms to include natural synonyms and variations: 'test-driven development', 'TDD', 'red-green-refactor', 'write tests first', 'unit testing workflow'.

Restructure to follow the pattern: '<what it does>. Use when <explicit triggers>.' to ensure both components are clearly present.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

No concrete actions are described. The description contains no verbs describing what the skill does—only mentions 'tdd workflows tdd refactor' without specifying any capabilities.

1 / 5

Completeness

Has a weak 'when' clause ('Use when working with tdd workflows') but completely lacks a 'what' component—there is no description of what the skill actually does. The 'when' itself is also vague and circular.

1 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant keywords like 'tdd', 'workflows', and 'refactor' that users might naturally say, but lacks synonyms and variations such as 'test-driven development', 'red-green-refactor', 'unit tests', or 'test first'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The mention of 'tdd' provides some niche specificity, but the vagueness of 'workflows' and 'refactor' could overlap with general coding, testing, or refactoring skills.

3 / 5

Total

8

/

20

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.