Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized with real endpoints and concrete query examples, giving strong actionability. It is weakened by verbosity/overlap across sections, missing validation for batch ID-mapping, and bundle reference files that are named but absent.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (api_fields.md, query_syntax.md, id_mapping_databases.md, api_examples.md, uniprot_client.py) or remove the dangling references, since broken links hurt navigation.
Add an explicit validate/retry step to the ID mapping workflow (e.g. handle a FAILED status and re-submit) to satisfy the batch-operation feedback-loop requirement.
Trim redundancy by collapsing the overlapping Query Syntax Examples and Best Practices material, and drop the encyclopedic Overview sentence about what UniProt is.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Well-structured but padded: the Overview restates known facts ('UniProt is the world's leading...') and Core Capabilities, Query Syntax Examples, and Best Practices overlap considerably, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready REST endpoints and query examples (e.g. 'https://rest.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/search?query=...'), with only minor gaps such as the referenced helper script not being provided. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The ID mapping workflow is sequenced (run → status → results) with a status checkpoint, but batch operations (up to 100,000 IDs) lack explicit validation or error-recovery feedback loops, capping this at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled in-body and in a Resources section, but the referenced files (/references/*.md, scripts/uniprot_client.py) do not exist, so navigation breaks and substantial detail stays inlined in SKILL.md. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |