CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

wordpress-theme-development

WordPress theme development workflow covering theme architecture, template hierarchy, custom post types, block editor support, responsive design, and WordPress 7.0 features: DataViews, Pattern Editing, Navigation Overlays, and admin refresh.

54

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/wordpress-theme-development/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is wordpress-theme-development in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-sequenced, action-rich workflow with strong executable code examples and useful checklists. Its main weaknesses are redundant checklists and overview padding, plus a monolithic single-file structure with no progressive disclosure into reference files.

Suggestions

Consolidate the three overlapping checklists (Theme Checklist, Quality Gates, Testing Checklist) into a single verification section to remove redundancy.

Move the large theme.json and block-pattern reference blocks into a references/ file (e.g., references/theme-json.md) and link to them from the body to improve progressive disclosure.

Drop or tighten the 'Copy-Paste Prompts' blocks and the Overview paragraph that restates the frontmatter description.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with actionable code, but the Overview restates the frontmatter description, three overlapping checklists (Theme Checklist, Quality Gates, Testing Checklist) repeat the same items, and 'Copy-Paste Prompts' sections add light padding, so it could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Mostly executable guidance is provided via complete theme.json, CPT registration, block pattern, navigation overlay, and breadcrumb filter code, with only minor gaps such as the placeholder '<!-- Pattern content with Icon blocks -->'.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Eight phases are clearly sequenced with 'Skills to Invoke' and numbered actions, plus a dedicated Testing phase and checklists acting as verification checkpoints, though per-phase validation feedback loops are not explicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The file is well-organized into clear sections, but no bundle files exist and all detailed reference material (theme.json, block pattern JSON, breadcrumb PHP) is inlined in a ~500-line SKILL.md rather than split into one-level-deep reference files.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys the skill's scope and domain with solid trigger terms, but it lists coverage topics rather than concrete actions and omits any explicit 'Use when...' trigger guidance. It is distinguishable but carries minor overlap risk with related WordPress skills.

Suggestions

Rewrite coverage topics as concrete verbs (e.g., 'Create custom WordPress themes, register custom post types, configure theme.json, and implement block patterns').

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural triggers (e.g., 'Use when building a WordPress theme, adding Gutenberg block support, or implementing WordPress 7.0 features').

Include the synonym 'Gutenberg' and 'theme.json' to broaden natural keyword coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several specific coverage areas ('theme architecture, template hierarchy, custom post types, block editor support, responsive design'), but these are topic nouns framed by 'workflow covering' rather than concrete actions like 'create', 'register', or 'configure', so it falls at the 3 anchor rather than 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear ('workflow covering ...') but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms a user would say are present ('WordPress theme development', 'custom post types', 'block editor', 'responsive design', 'WordPress 7.0'), but common synonyms like 'Gutenberg' and 'theme.json' are missing, placing it just below comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The WordPress theme development niche with WP 7.0 features is mostly distinct, but there is minor overlap risk with sibling WordPress skills (plugin development, WooCommerce) referenced in the bundle.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (502 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.