Name: youtube-summarizer
Rating: 51.2 (1 reviews)
Author: administrakt0r

youtube-summarizer

Extract transcripts from YouTube videos and generate comprehensive, detailed summaries using intelligent analysis frameworks

Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/youtube-summarizer/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is youtube-summarizer in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Quality

Content

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill has a clear sequenced workflow with useful transcript-extraction code, but it is padded with decorative progress-box scaffolding, its central summarization step references an undefined "Phase 2" prompt, and it fails to point at the bundle scripts that already implement the inlined logic.

Suggestions

Replace Step 4's "Use the enhanced prompt from Phase 2" with the actual STAR + R-I-S-E prompt text or a reference to a file that contains it.

Remove the decorative ASCII progress/status boxes and progress-gauge formatting specs; they bloat the context window without aiding execution.

Reference the existing scripts (e.g., "Run scripts/extract-transcript.py VIDEO_ID" and "scripts/install-dependencies.sh") instead of inlining their logic, and fix the mojibake-corrupted emoji/box characters.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Noticeably verbose: a large decorative ASCII progress/status box with mojibake, elaborate progress-gauge formatting guidelines, and leaked example content ("Welcome to this comprehensive tutorial...") add padding without helping Claude.	2 / 5
Actionability	Transcript-extraction and URL-validation code is executable, but the core deliverable (Step 4 summary generation) only says to "Use the enhanced prompt from Phase 2 (STAR + R-I-S-E framework)" — that prompt and "Phase 2" are never defined, leaving the main task without concrete guidance.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear five-step sequence (validate URL, check availability, extract, summarize, format) with validation checkpoints and an error-handling table, though Step 4's broken "Phase 2" reference is a minor gap and there are no retry feedback loops.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are well-organized by step, but the body inlines transcript-extraction code that already exists in scripts/extract-transcript.py and install-dependencies.sh without ever referencing those bundle files, so content that belongs in separate files is duplicated inline.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Description

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys a distinct YouTube-transcript-summarization niche with decent trigger keywords, but it lacks any explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance and leans on vague phrasing ("intelligent analysis frameworks").

Suggestions

Add an explicit "Use when..." clause naming natural triggers (e.g., "Use when the user provides a YouTube URL and asks to summarize it or extract its transcript").

Replace "intelligent analysis frameworks" with the concrete framework name (e.g., "STAR + R-I-S-E") so the action is specific rather than buzzwordy.

Include verb-form triggers users actually say, such as "summarize" or "recap a YouTube video".

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ("YouTube videos") and two concrete actions ("Extract transcripts", "generate ... summaries"), but "intelligent analysis frameworks" is vague fluff rather than a concrete action, so coverage is not comprehensive.	3 / 5
Completeness	A clear "what" is present, but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so completeness is capped at 3 per the rubric guideline.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Good natural keyword coverage ("transcripts", "YouTube videos", "summaries", "analysis") that a user would plausibly say, though verb forms/synonyms like "summarize" or "recap" are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The YouTube-video + transcript-extraction niche is highly specific with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Path: plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/youtube-summarizer/SKILL.md
Commit: 900c504

Reviewed: 1 hour ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.