Conciseness

The body is dense and mostly purposeful — Fusion-specific facts Claude won't know ("there is no bulk-read endpoint", operations/iteration-depth model) earn their tokens. But the read-only claim repeats the frontmatter and itself ("It reports; it never modifies the blueprint", "This step is strictly read-only"), the scope guard appears twice, and the operations model is explained in both "What this does" and "How to explain the findings" — anchor 4's minor over-explanation that could be trimmed.

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready commands cover the common cases: "python scripts/analyze_blueprint.py <blueprint.json> [<blueprint2.json> ...]", "--callmix <calls.csv>", "Add `--json` for a machine-readable result", and "--ids", with the CSV's required columns specified ("Resource, Method, Status Code, and optionally Duration"). Matches anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

A clear three-step sequence (get files, run, "Present the Markdown report as the deliverable") with explicit conditionals (non-Planning blueprints "returns a clear 'not applicable' result listing the connectors it did find"; "if no MCP is connected, skip it") and a fidelity check ("Do not invent numbers the script did not produce"). Falls short of anchor 5 because there is no error-recovery guidance if the script itself fails or the export is malformed — minor validation gaps, matching anchor 4.

Progressive Disclosure

A concise overview with two verified, one-level-deep references, each clearly signaled with a read condition: "Finding codes, their rationale, and recommended fixes are in `references/findings.md`. Read it when you need the full explanation for a code" and "The full workflow, and one important caveat ... are in `references/mcp-enrichment.md`. Read it when a Planning MCP is available." Only summaries are inlined; both files exist and contain exactly what is promised. Matches anchor 5.

Specificity

Concrete actions are enumerated across four named dimensions ("Review an exported Adobe Workfront Planning + Fusion scenario blueprint (.json) for performance, speed, resource use, and API call volume") plus a defined deliverable ("produce a prioritized optimization self-review"), and nothing the skill does is left out. Matches anchor 5 rather than 4 because there are no coverage gaps, and the negative scope ("if a scenario does not use Planning, it says so and does not apply") adds precision rather than padding.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: what ("Review an exported ... blueprint (.json) for performance, speed, resource use, and API call volume, and produce a prioritized optimization self-review") and when with concrete trigger phrases ("Use this whenever someone shares a Fusion scenario that uses Workfront Planning (Maestro) and wants it faster, cheaper, or more reliable ... Trigger for phrases like ..."). Matches anchor 5 exactly.

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-language triggers: symptom phrases ("slow runs, long execution time, scenario timeouts, high operations consumption, too many API calls, or rate-limit / 429 errors"), verbatim user quotes ("make my Fusion scenario faster", "why is this Planning scenario so slow"), synonyms ("Workfront Planning (Maestro)", "replication or sync"), and the file extension ("blueprint (.json)"). Matches anchor 5's comprehensive coverage including synonyms and extensions.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A hard niche with an explicit scope guard ("It is specific to the Workfront Planning connector: if a scenario does not use Planning, it says so and does not apply") leaves minimal overlap risk with general Fusion or other connector skills. Matches anchor 5's clear niche with distinct triggers.