Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear, validated eval-first workflow and concrete templates, but it mixes actionable examples with abstract principles and carries minor redundancy between the intro, Operating Principles, and When-to-Use sections.
Suggestions
Cut the redundant "When to Use This Skill" section (or fold it into the intro), since it duplicates the description and Operating Principles.
Convert abstract Operating Principles into concrete starting actions, e.g. "Define completion criteria" → "Write a one-line done condition per unit before implementation begins".
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with short lists and code blocks, but the opening line and the "When to Use This Skill" section largely restate the description and Operating Principles, so it could be tightened; not the padded verbosity of anchor 1. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete copy-paste templates (decomposition tree, Haiku/Sonnet/Opus routing with examples, cost-tracking block, review checklist) but interleaves them with abstract direction like "Define completion criteria before execution", so it sits between anchors 2 and 3 rather than fully executable throughout. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Eval-First Loop is a clear 4-step sequence with explicit validation (re-run evals and compare deltas) and a regression-check feedback loop, and a review checklist is provided, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained SKILL.md with no bundle files, organized into clearly labeled sections and no nested references; well-organized enough to score 3 per the simple-skill guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |