Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, opinionated instruction-only skill that assumes Claude's competence and provides concrete rules, a clear process, and a validation quality gate. Actionability could be nudged higher with a brief worked example.
Suggestions
Add one short before/after example illustrating the banned-pattern removal and 'lead with the concrete thing' rule to lift actionability to fully copy-paste-ready specificity.
Show a tiny sample VOICE PROFILE handoff from brand-voice so the voice-reuse step is concrete rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no concept explanation or padding; tight rules, a compact banned-patterns list, and a punchy voice statement where every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific instruction-only guidance (lead with the concrete thing, explain after the example, named banned phrases, per-medium structural rules) with only minor gaps versus copy-paste-ready specificity. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Writing Process is clearly sequenced and the Quality Gate acts as an explicit pre-delivery validation checklist with a feedback-style gate, satisfying the checkpoint anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-organized skill under 50 lines with clearly labeled sections and no nested references, which per the simple-skills note can score 5 on well-organized structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |