CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

automation-audit-ops

Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything.

74

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is tdg-personal/automation-audit-ops

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, audit-first instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and concrete output template. Its main weakness is mild redundancy where the live-state taxonomy and guardrail cautions are restated across sections.

Suggestions

Define the five live-state categories once (e.g., in Workflow step 2) and reference them from Guardrails instead of repeating the full list.

Collapse overlapping cautions: 'do not claim a tool is live just because a skill or config references it' (Guardrails) and 'do not treat present in config as working' (Pitfalls) say the same thing — keep one.

Optionally add one or two concrete enumeration commands (e.g., `gh workflow list`, inspecting `.mcp.json` / hook config) to push actionability from strong-guidance to fully executable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean and bullet-driven, but the five live-state categories (configured / authenticated / recently verified / stale or broken / missing) are repeated in both Guardrails and Workflow step 2, and Pitfalls restates Guardrails.

2 / 3

Actionability

For an instruction-only orchestration skill it gives concrete surfaces to inventory, explicit classification categories, a proof-path source list, and a copy-paste ready output format template, delegating enumeration to named sibling skills.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced four-step workflow (Inventory -> Classify -> Trace proof -> Recommend) with an explicit ambiguity checkpoint ('If the current state is ambiguous, say so directly') and a dedicated Verification section.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into focused sections with one-level-deep references to sibling ECC skills (workspace-surface-audit, github-ops, etc.); no nested or monolithic references, and no bundle files to misroute.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that covers what, when, and distinctive triggers concisely. It avoids fluff and over-claims while listing concrete capability surfaces.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete actions ('automation inventory and overlap audit') and enumerates specific surface types ('jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers') plus live states ('live, broken, redundant, or missing').

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states what it does (evidence-first inventory and overlap audit) and when to use it via a clear 'Use when...' clause with concrete triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing' maps directly to natural user phrasing like 'what is live' / 'what is broken' / 'what overlaps'.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to ECC automation auditing with a distinct read-only inventory niche and specific surface vocabulary, making conflict with unrelated skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.