Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clearly organized reference for an obsolete v1 skill with useful configuration snippets, but it carries significant inline research/comparison material that inflates its token budget without serving the skill's current function. The core executable (evaluate-session.sh) is referenced but not provided, and validation steps for the extraction workflow are absent.
Suggestions
Move the Homunculus comparison table and 'Mejoras Potenciales v2' research notes into a separate archived doc and link to it, keeping the SKILL.md body focused on the v1 Stop-hook workflow.
Bundle or inline the evaluate-session.sh script so the central hook command is actually executable rather than a dangling reference.
Add a validation/checklist step to the extraction workflow (e.g., verify extracted patterns against ignore_patterns before writing to ~/.claude/skills/learned/) to lift workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with clear sections, but it includes substantial content that does not earn its place for an obsolete skill: a full Homunculus comparison table and 'Mejoras Potenciales v2' notes that restate concepts and research findings rather than guiding the user's current task. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready configuration blocks (the config.json fields, the Stop hook settings.json snippet, and the evaluate-session.sh command path), but the referenced evaluate-session.sh script is never bundled or shown, leaving the central executable step incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Cómo Funciona' section lists a clear three-step sequence (evaluar, detectar, extraer), but there are no validation or verification checkpoints for the extraction/editing of learned skills, which the rubric expects for batch or destructive-style operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-sectioned and mostly inline-appropriate with a single one-level reference ('docs/continuous-learning-v2-spec.md'), but that referenced spec file is not present in the bundle and the comparison/research material that could live in a separate file is kept inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |