Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured research workflow with concrete, executable MCP calls and a complete report template. The main improvement is trimming the explanatory prose and drift warning to tighten token efficiency.
Suggestions
Tighten conciseness by condensing the drift-warning blockquote into a one-line caveat and removing the rationale behind the clarifying questions.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after search (e.g. 'confirm N unique sources before drafting') to strengthen the workflow's feedback loop.
Consider extracting the full report markdown template into a reference file once the skill grows, keeping SKILL.md as an overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean workflow with concrete tool calls, but the drift-warning blockquote and a few explanatory sentences (e.g. clarifying-question rationale) could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-ready tool invocations with parameters (firecrawl_search limit, web_search_advanced_exa startPublishedDate) plus a full executable report template cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with explicit quality rules, but lacks explicit validation feedback loops; acceptable here as research is not a destructive or batch operation, so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single well-sectioned file with no bundle files needed; structure is clear and navigable, though a few dense blocks (the report template) could be split out if the skill grew. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |