CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

docker-patterns

Patrones de Docker y Docker Compose para desarrollo local, seguridad de contenedores, networking, estrategias de volúmenes y orquestación de múltiples servicios.

59

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./docs/es/skills/docker-patterns/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, executable reference of Docker/Compose patterns with excellent actionability and good token efficiency, but it lacks explicit validation workflows for its destructive operations and keeps all content inline with no progressive disclosure to separate reference files.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/verification step before destructive commands (e.g. a pre-flight check or 'verify no important volumes before down -v') to lift workflow clarity above 3.

Move the large compose/Dockerfile/.dockerignore examples into referenced files under references/ (e.g. references/docker-compose.dev.yml) and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

Tighten the few prose explanations (service discovery, volume strategy intros) to lean comments or section leads to push conciseness toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean code and config blocks with brief inline comments that assume Claude's knowledge; only minor prose intros ('Los servicios en la misma red de Compose se resuelven por nombre de servicio') could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready examples — a complete docker-compose.yml, multi-stage dev/build/production Dockerfile, override files, security hardening, and a debug command catalog — cover the common cases concretely.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections are well-organized but this is a reference/patterns doc with no explicit multi-step validate→fix→retry loops, and destructive operations ('docker compose down -v (DESTRUCTIVO)', 'docker system prune') appear without validation checkpoints, capping workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and ~360 lines are inlined entirely in SKILL.md; section headers give structure, but content that could live in separate references (full compose stack, Dockerfile, .dockerignore) is inline with no external file pointers.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a clear, distinctive Docker niche and several specific capability areas using natural trigger terms, but it omits an explicit 'Use when...' clause, capping completeness at 3. Adding concrete trigger phrases would lift the completeness and trigger-term dimensions.

Suggestions

Append an explicit 'Use when...' clause in Spanish listing concrete trigger scenarios (e.g. 'Usar cuando se configure Docker Compose para desarrollo local, se revisen Dockerfiles, o se resuelvan problemas de networking o volúmenes').

Lead with concrete action verbs (Configurar, Diseñar, Revisar, Migrar) instead of noun-list topics to strengthen specificity.

Add common synonyms/extensions users say (Dockerfile, .yml, contenedores) to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several specific capability areas — 'desarrollo local, seguridad de contenedores, networking, estrategias de volúmenes y orquestación de múltiples servicios' — but these are topics/nouns rather than concrete action verbs, leaving minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (Docker/Compose patterns across several domains) but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say ('Docker Compose', 'desarrollo local', 'seguridad de contenedores', 'networking', 'volúmenes', 'orquestación') with good coverage, though a few synonyms and file extensions (e.g. Dockerfile) are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear Docker/Docker Compose niche with distinct triggers, with only minor overlap risk against general container-orchestration (e.g. Kubernetes) skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.