docker-patterns

Patrones de Docker y Docker Compose para desarrollo local, seguridad de contenedores, networking, estrategias de volúmenes y orquestación de múltiples servicios.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

High

Do not use without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./docs/es/skills/docker-patterns/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A dense, highly actionable pattern reference whose code examples are copy-paste ready and whose organization is clean, with no padded explanations. Its weakest points are the absence of any explicit workflow sequence with validation checkpoints and slight redundancy in the volumes section.

Suggestions

Add a short ordered setup workflow with a validation checkpoint (e.g., 1. build via compose target dev, 2. 'docker compose ps' / hit the app healthcheck, 3. only then attach the debugger), especially around the flagged destructive commands.

Deduplicate the volume-strategy commentary — keep the named/bind/anonymous volume explanations in one place instead of restating the node_modules pattern in both 'Estrategias de Volúmenes' and 'Patrones Comunes'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is dominated by lean, comment-annotated code with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only minor trimming is possible (the anonymous-volume/bind-mount pattern is explained in 'Estrategias de Volúmenes' and again in 'Patrones Comunes'), so it falls just short of the leanest anchor.	4 / 5
Actionability	Fully executable, copy-paste-ready material: a complete docker-compose.yml with healthchecks, a multi-stage Dockerfile, override files, and a full debugging command catalog covering the common cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	This is a reference-style skill with no explicit multi-step setup sequence; healthcheck-gated 'depends_on' and flagged destructive commands ('down -v (DESTRUCTIVO)') provide partial checkpoints, but no validate/verify loop exists around the destructive operations, which caps the score at 3.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist and the single body is cleanly sectioned with nothing buried or nested; however, ~360 lines are all inline with some content (e.g., the debugging command catalog) that could sit in a reference file, so it does not reach the well-split anchor 5.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and domain-scoped with a solid set of natural Docker keywords, but it is purely a 'what' statement with no 'when to use' trigger guidance, which both caps completeness and weakens its distinctiveness. Adding an explicit activation clause would lift the two lowest dimensions.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Usar cuando se configure Docker Compose, se escriba o revise un Dockerfile, o se resuelvan problemas de contenedores, networking o volúmenes.'

Convert topic nouns into concrete actions ('Configurar Docker Compose para desarrollo local, asegurar contenedores, diseñar networking y volúmenes...') to sharpen specificity.

Add natural synonyms users say aloud — 'Dockerfile', 'dockerizar', 'contenedorizar' — to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the Docker/Docker Compose domain and five concrete capability areas ('desarrollo local', 'seguridad de contenedores', 'networking', 'estrategias de volúmenes', 'orquestación de múltiples servicios'), but these are topic nouns rather than concrete actions, matching the anchor for domain plus limited actionable description.	3 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is clear (Docker/Compose patterns across five areas) but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3; it is not a 4 because the 'when' is entirely absent rather than just under-specified.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural terms users would say ('Docker', 'Docker Compose', 'contenedores', 'networking', 'volúmenes', 'desarrollo local') with good coverage, but misses common variations such as 'Dockerfile', 'dockerizar', or 'contenedorizar'.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	A clearly Docker-specific niche with low overlap risk against unrelated skills, though it could still collide with adjacent container/CI skills since no distinct trigger phrases are given; anchor 5 requires distinct triggers, which are absent.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: affaan-m/ECC
Path: docs/es/skills/docker-patterns/SKILL.md
Commit: c70874f

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.