Conciseness

The body is lean with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the 'When to Activate' and 'When to Use' sections duplicate each other ('Do not activate for a narrowly named skill...' vs 'For a direct ADR or regression request, invoke that specialized skill without routing through this one') and the Boundaries section repeats the intro's non-goals. This matches anchor 4 (minor instances that could be trimmed) rather than the every-token-earns-its-place ideal of anchor 5.

Actionability

The intent-to-skill routing table and the concrete command 'python3 <docs-governance-skill>/scripts/audit-docs.py --root <repository> --scope full' with enumerated exit codes (0/1/2) provide mostly executable guidance. Minor gaps — 'Resolve the selected skill directory first' and routing-table targets are given without invocation mechanics — keep it at anchor 4 rather than fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

'How It Works' gives a clear 5-step sequence and the audit section defines explicit exit-code checkpoints and warning semantics, satisfying most of anchor 4. It is not anchor 5 because there is no error-recovery loop beyond 'Report failures, warnings, and ownership gaps' and no guidance on what happens after a capability is selected. The destructive/batch cap does not apply since the audit is explicitly read-only.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a clear overview that pushes role-resolution detail into a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ([the artifact-role contract](references/artifact-role-contract.md), verified to exist and to contain the role registry) and keeps scripts bundled under scripts/. The routing table and audit semantics that belong inline stay inline, matching anchor 5's clear overview with well-signaled references.

Specificity

The description names the domain and concrete actions — 'Route broad documentation-governance requests to existing ECC skills and run an opt-in, read-only audit of mapped documentation roles, links, ADR indexes, and evidence references' — with enumerated audit targets. It falls short of anchor 5 because the specific routed capabilities (ADR recording, regression preservation, loop design) are collapsed into the generic verb 'route'.

Completeness

It explicitly answers 'what' (routing plus a read-only audit of roles, links, ADR indexes, and evidence references) and 'when' ('Use when a user asks for documentation governance, project-knowledge organization, documentation integrity, or a deterministic docs audit without naming a narrower skill') with concrete trigger phrases and a negative boundary, matching anchor 5.

Trigger Term Quality

'documentation governance, project-knowledge organization, documentation integrity, or a deterministic docs audit' are phrases a user would naturally say. A few natural variants are missing (e.g., 'organize project docs', 'documentation structure'), matching anchor 4 rather than the comprehensive synonym coverage of anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Route broad documentation-governance requests' combined with the explicit carve-out 'without naming a narrower skill' establishes a clear router niche and disambiguates it from the narrower skills it routes to, satisfying anchor 5's 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk'.