Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow for the Context7 MCP with clear sequencing and a useful call-limit guardrail. The main improvement opportunity is condensing the repetitive Examples section to tighten the token budget.
Suggestions
Collapse the three near-identical Examples (Next.js, Prisma, Supabase) into one worked example plus a short list of other library/library-id pairs, since each repeats the same resolve→select→query→use flow.
Consider showing one literal tool-call block (e.g. resolve-library-id with libraryName and query) instead of prose parameter lists to push actionability toward copy-paste readiness.
Add an explicit verify step after query-docs (e.g. confirm returned snippets actually address the question before answering) to strengthen the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the three Examples (Next.js, Prisma, Supabase) re-state the same four-step workflow, which is minor repetition that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete MCP tool names, named parameters (libraryName, query, libraryId), and example values (/vercel/next.js) covering common cases; lacks literal code blocks but that suits an MCP-tool skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear four-step sequence with an explicit gate ("Do not call query-docs without a valid library ID") and a 3-call guardrail with a fallback to stating uncertainty; no true verify-and-retry loop keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained with no bundle files and well-organized sections (Core Concepts, When to use, How it works, Examples, Best Practices); mild repetition across Examples and length over 50 lines keep it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |