CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

e2e-testing

Patrones de pruebas E2E con Playwright, Page Object Model, configuración, integración CI/CD, gestión de artefactos y estrategias para pruebas inestables.

60

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./docs/es/skills/e2e-testing/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with executable, copy-paste-ready code across config, POM, tests, CI, and Web3 cases, and is well-organized with no padding. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'diagnose → fix → re-run' feedback loop for the flaky-tests section (e.g. run --repeat-each=10, inspect failures, apply the matching fix, re-run to confirm green) to raise workflow_clarity.

For the financial/critical flows section, include an explicit validation checkpoint before the confirm step (e.g. assert preview values match before clicking confirm) since it involves irreversible operations.

Consider a brief 'Quick start → Advanced' split if the file grows, though the current single-file structure is appropriate at this length.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Almost entirely code/config blocks with tight section headers and no padded explanations of what Playwright or CI is; only the '// Mal:' / '// Bien:' anti-pattern comments are mildly instructive, which is justified.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready TypeScript for the Playwright config, Page Object Model, test specs, wallet mocks, and a full CI YAML workflow covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections are organized by concern and the flaky-test section has a loose diagnostic flow, but there is no multi-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints or a validate→fix→retry feedback loop.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single cohesive file with clear section headers and no nested references; at ~327 lines it is longer than the simple-skill exception but remains well-structured and appropriately self-contained with no bundle files.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a concrete, distinctive niche with good natural trigger terms, but it omits any explicit 'Use when...' guidance, leaving the activation trigger implicit and capping completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit activation clause, e.g. 'Úsalo cuando se necesiten pruebas E2E con Playwright, Page Object Model, o al depurar pruebas inestables (flaky).'

Include synonyms and file extensions users actually say, such as 'flaky tests', '.spec.ts', or 'tests de UI', to broaden trigger coverage.

Reframe capability topics as concrete actions ('estructura pruebas con POM', 'diagnostica pruebas inestables') to push specificity from 4 toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names several concrete domains — 'Page Object Model, configuración, integración CI/CD, gestión de artefactos y estrategias para pruebas inestables' — but these are capability topics rather than discrete executable actions, leaving minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

Gives a clear 'what' (E2E testing patterns across several areas) but has no 'Use when...' trigger clause, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms a user would say ('pruebas E2E', 'Playwright', 'Page Object Model', 'CI/CD', 'pruebas inestables') but lacks synonyms and file extensions like 'flaky tests' or '.spec.ts'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Playwright + E2E + Page Object Model + flaky tests' carves a clear niche with only minor overlap risk against general testing skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.