CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ecc-tools-cost-audit

Evidence-first ECC Tools burn and billing audit workflow. Use when investigating runaway PR creation, quota bypass, premium-model leakage, duplicate jobs, or GitHub App cost spikes in the ECC Tools repo.

78

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, lean audit workflow with concrete inspection targets, an explicitly ordered fix sequence, and a verification checkpoint. Sections are clearly organized with no concept-explaining padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean bullet-pointed workflow that assumes Claude's competence—it never explains what webhooks, queues, or billing are, and every section earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Names concrete inspection surfaces ('src/index.*', webhook router, queue producer/consumer, PR creation path) and an ordered fix priority list; guidance is specific and actionable for an instruction-only audit skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Six-step sequence (Freeze scope → Trace ingress → Trace worker → Audit burn paths → Fix in burn order → Verify) with an explicit verification checkpoint and a feedback gate ('do not claim burn is fixed until the narrow proving step was rerun').

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Single well-organized SKILL.md with clearly labeled sections and no nested references; sibling-skill mentions are by name and appropriately one level deep, with no bundle files needed.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description with concrete capabilities, natural trigger terms, and an explicit Use-when clause scoped to a distinct niche. No verbosity or over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete audit actions—'runaway PR creation, quota bypass, premium-model leakage, duplicate jobs, or GitHub App cost spikes'—rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Evidence-first ECC Tools burn and billing audit workflow') and when ('Use when investigating...'), with an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Uses natural operator phrasing a user would actually say ('burn', 'cost spikes', 'runaway PR creation', 'quota bypass', 'premium-model leakage', 'duplicate jobs') with good coverage of variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Narrowed to the ECC Tools repo with distinct cost/billing-audit triggers, making conflict with generic code-review or billing skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.