CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

energy-procurement

Codified expertise for electricity and gas procurement, tariff optimization, demand charge management, renewable PPA evaluation, and multi-facility energy cost management. Informed by energy procurement managers with 15+ years experience at large commercial and industrial consumers. Includes market structure analysis, hedging strategies, load profiling, and sustainability reporting frameworks. Use when procuring energy, optimizing tariffs, managing demand charges, evaluating PPAs, or developing energy strategies.

64

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/energy-procurement/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is tdg-personal/energy-procurement

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Rich, domain-accurate content with strong actionability and a clear workflow, but it is verbose and ships as one large inlined file with no progressive disclosure into bundled references. Splitting edge cases, escalation protocols, and performance indicators into reference files would materially improve it.

Suggestions

Move the Key Edge Cases, Escalation Protocols, and Performance Indicators sections into separate reference files (e.g. references/edge-cases.md, references/escalation.md) and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

Tighten explanatory prose (e.g. LMP components, REC pricing tiers) into scannable bullet form to reduce token load while keeping the concrete numbers.

Add explicit validation/retry feedback loops to the core 'How It Works' workflow (e.g. 'after RFP, validate bids against total-cost model; if gaps, re-issue') to lift workflow clarity to the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Dense with genuinely specialized numbers and mechanics, but several prose paragraphs (e.g. LMP decomposition, REC pricing tiers) could be tightened into scannable bullets; mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation rather than lean throughout.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete thresholds and formulas (Load factor = kWh/(Peak kW×Hours), payback <5yr justified / >8yr fails), decision frameworks, and an escalation table with timelines; minor gaps remain as guidance is instructional rather than copy-paste executable.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 6-step 'How It Works' sequence plus numbered decision frameworks and an escalation table with triggers/actions/timelines; the core workflow lacks explicit validate-and-retry feedback loops, keeping it just below the top anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single ~30KB monolithic SKILL.md with well-organized headers but no bundled reference files (references/scripts/assets absent) and no one-level-deep links; content like escalation protocols, edge cases, or performance tables could be split into separate files.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that concretely enumerates capabilities and provides explicit 'Use when' triggers with natural phrasing. Only minor synonym coverage is missing, so trigger quality sits just below the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and lists multiple concrete actions — 'tariff optimization, demand charge management, renewable PPA evaluation,' plus 'hedging strategies, load profiling' — giving comprehensive coverage of capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does ('codified expertise for electricity and gas procurement...') and when to use it ('Use when procuring energy, optimizing tariffs, managing demand charges, evaluating PPAs, or developing energy strategies').

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit trigger phrases ('Use when procuring energy, optimizing tariffs, managing demand charges, evaluating PPAs') are natural, but some common synonyms a user might say (e.g. 'buying electricity', 'utility bills', 'electricity contract') are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (C&I energy procurement) with distinct, specialized triggers that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.