Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and actionable with concrete eval templates, grader examples, and integration commands. Its main weakness is the evaluation workflow, which lacks explicit validation/feedback-loop checkpoints despite covering batch and regression operations.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the 'Evaluar' step, e.g., 'if an eval fails, record the failure, fix the code, and re-run until PASS' to establish a feedback loop.
Replace placeholder directives like '[Ejecutar cada eval de capacidad, registrar PASS/FAIL]' with a concrete runnable command or a precise sub-procedure.
Consider moving the longer template catalogs (eval types and grader types) into a reference file under references/ and linking to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, using templates and code blocks rather than prose, with only minor restatements of obvious ideas ('Los evals lentos no se ejecutan'); it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-pasteable templates and commands (grep/npm checks, [CAPABILITY EVAL] blocks, /eval define|check|report with file paths), with only minor gaps from placeholder names like 'feature-name'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Flujo de Trabajo' section lists a clear 4-step sequence (Definir → Implementar → Evaluar → Reportar), but the Evaluar step uses a placeholder ('[Ejecutar cada eval...]') and lacks explicit validation checkpoints or fix-and-retry feedback loops, which the rubric caps at 3 for batch/regression operations. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single, well-organized SKILL.md with clear section headers and no nested references; slightly above a 3 because structure is good, though a few dense template sections could justify a separate reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |