Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, code-complete pattern catalog with executable TypeScript examples and minimal prose, held back by fully inlined content (no reference files despite 640 lines), placeholder implementations in the Dropdown and form examples, and no guidance for choosing between competing patterns.
Suggestions
Split the body into one-level-deep reference files (e.g., references/hooks.md, references/state-management.md, references/performance.md, references/accessibility.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview linking to them.
Complete the placeholder implementations — the Dropdown's '{/* 下拉選單實作 */}' and the form's '{/* 其他欄位 */}' — and show the shared type definitions (Market, MarketCardProps) and imports so every example is truly copy-paste runnable.
Add brief decision guidance per section (e.g., 'use context+reducer when multiple distant components share mutating state; use a custom hook when only one subtree needs it') so the catalog also tells Claude which pattern to pick, not just how to write it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is code-dominant with almost no padding: each pattern is a header, executable TypeScript, and a brief usage example, assuming Claude's competence (e.g., no explanation of what composition or memoization is). It is not a 5 because of minor trims available: the closing '**記住**' platitude, a fully duplicated Modal component across the animation and focus sections, and the long virtualization boilerplate. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Patterns are concrete, typed, copy-paste-ready code with usage examples covering common cases (Tabs, DataLoader, useQuery, useDebounce, ErrorBoundary, forms). It stops short of anchor 5 because of minor gaps: placeholder comments ('{/* 下拉選單實作 */}', '{/* 其他欄位 */}'), omitted React imports, and referenced-but-undefined types like 'Market' and 'MarketCardProps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The catalog is coherently organized by category (components, hooks, state, performance, forms, errors, a11y), but it is a reference, not a workflow: there is no guidance on when to choose one pattern over another (e.g., context+reducer vs. custom hook) and no validation/verification checkpoints. It is above anchor 2 because sections are well-defined, but below anchor 4 because pattern-selection guidance and checkpoints are absent rather than merely minor. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers are clear and consistently structured, giving reasonable in-file navigation, but the ~640-line body inlines every pattern family (components, hooks, state, performance, forms, a11y, animation) with no bundle files — several of these clearly belong in separate reference files. This matches anchor 3 (structure present, content that should be separate is inline) rather than 2 (structure is not minimal). | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |