CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

growth-log

Use after a complex task, failure, or when reviewing what was learned. Teaches how to write growth logs that extract reusable patterns — not diary entries.

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a strong, actionable methodology skill with concrete templates, examples, a validation checklist, and clear anti-patterns. The only meaningful gap is minor conciseness framing and the absence of any progressive-disclosure file split for a fairly long single file.

Suggestions

Tighten the opening blockquote and the 'nutritionally denser' metaphor in Rule 1 to reduce framing overhead.

Consider moving the Entry Types table or the detailed worked examples into a references file (e.g., references/entry-types.md) to shorten the main SKILL.md and add one-level-deep navigation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and avoids explaining basic concepts Claude already knows, but the intro blockquote and metaphorical framing ('nutritionally denser than a success') are minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides a copy-paste markdown entry template, a concrete 5-step pattern-extraction process, multi-domain worked examples (web dev, data pipeline), an entry-types table, and an anti-patterns list — fully actionable for an instruction skill.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence from activation criteria through the three rules to the template, with an explicit 'Quality Checklist' serving as a validation gate before finalizing an entry.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references and good navigation, but the ~120-line body is a single monolithic file; some material (e.g., the entry-types table or detailed examples) could be split into a reference.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-formed: third-person voice, explicit 'what' and 'when' with concrete triggers, and a clear distinct niche. Its main weakness is breadth of trigger synonyms and only one named concrete action.

Suggestions

Add 1-2 more concrete actions (e.g., 'search existing entries for duplicate patterns', 'cross-link related growth logs') to lift specificity toward a 5.

Broaden trigger terms with natural synonyms users say: 'mistake', 'lessons learned', 'post-mortem', 'what did I learn'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ("growth logs") and one concrete action ("extract reusable patterns"), but does not list multiple specific actions, matching the '1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive' anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' ("Teaches how to write growth logs that extract reusable patterns") and 'when' ("Use after a complex task, failure, or when reviewing what was learned") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural triggers like "complex task", "failure", and "reviewing what was learned" are phrases a user would say, but common synonyms ("mistake", "lessons learned", "post-mortem") are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The growth-log / reusable-patterns niche is distinct, though the "after a complex task, failure" trigger is broad enough to create minor overlap risk with related reflection or post-task review skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.