Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured pattern reference with concrete rules, explicit sequencing, and built-in safety validation points; all four dimensions land at 4 rather than 5 due to minor redundancy, narrative rather than executable examples, absent error-recovery loops, and content that could be offloaded to reference files.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the critical-interaction blocking rule, which is stated both in the medication safety flow diagram and in the prose paragraph immediately after it — keep one authoritative statement.
Add a brief failure/recovery path for the medication safety workflow (e.g., what the clinician sees and must do when dose validation fails for weight/age/renal function) to complete the feedback loop.
Move the three Examples (or the detailed vitals/lab display specs) into a one-level-deep references/ file such as EXAMPLES.md, keeping SKILL.md as a tighter overview with clearly signaled links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — no padding explaining what EMRs, ICD-10, or WCAG are, and every section carries concrete domain rules. It falls short of anchor 5 only through minor redundancy, e.g., the critical-interaction block rule appearing in both the medication flow diagram and the prose paragraph that follows it. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: a concrete TypeScript interface, exact thresholds ("4.5:1 minimum contrast (WCAG AA)", "44x44px minimum"), and unambiguous rules ("CRITICAL interaction: BLOCK prescribing entirely"). It stops short of anchor 5 because the encounter-flow tree and the three Examples are narrative walkthroughs rather than directly usable code or artifacts. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The encounter flow is explicitly sequenced 1–9 and the medication pattern embeds validation checkpoints (interaction, allergy, dose checks with a hard block on critical), matching anchor 4. It lacks the explicit error-recovery feedback loops of anchor 5 — beyond "Override with reason" it never states what happens when a check fails or how to recover. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized file with clear section headers, no dead references, and content that is cohesive at its current size. At ~150 lines it exceeds the simple-skill exemption, and the ~40-line Examples section plus detailed UI display patterns could be split into one-level-deep reference files, keeping it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |