Name: investor-materials
Rating: 73.6 (1 reviews)
Author: affaan-m

investor-materials

Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is investor-materials in affaan-m/ECC

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, token-efficient instruction skill with a clear golden rule, per-asset guidance, and a pre-delivery quality gate. The gaps are in concrete anchoring: no worked examples or templates for the asset types, and the cross-check step is named but not operationalized.

Suggestions

Add one compact worked example — e.g., a filled-in use-of-funds table or deck outline with realistic sample numbers — to anchor the abstract directives in 'draft the asset with explicit logic' and 'make the ask precise'.

Operationalize the 'cross-check every number against the source of truth' step: a short procedure (list claims → map each to the source-of-truth entry → flag mismatches) would close the workflow's most explicit gap.

Specify the resolution path when conflicts surface mid-draft (who/what wins, how to update the source of truth) to turn the Golden Rule's 'stop and resolve' into a recoverable feedback loop.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and efficient — terse bullet lists, zero padding, and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., what a pitch deck is). Every section ('Golden Rule', 'Red Flags to Avoid', 'Quality Gate') earns its place with non-obvious, skill-specific guidance.	5 / 5
Actionability	Concrete guidance exists in the 12-step pitch deck flow and the pre-delivery Quality Gate checklist, but some directives remain abstract ('draft the asset with explicit logic', 'make the ask precise') with no worked examples, templates, or sample numbers to anchor execution. Not a 3 (the deck flow and checklists are specific), not a 5 (no example asset demonstrates the expected output).	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear 5-step core workflow exists with explicit checkpoints — 'If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting' and a 'Before delivering' quality gate. Not a 5 because the workflow steps themselves are abstract ('inventory the canonical facts', 'identify missing assumptions') with no concrete procedure for the step-5 cross-check or what to do when a mismatch surfaces mid-draft. Not a 3: checkpoints are explicitly present, not implicit.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	A single-file skill with no bundle directories; all ~90 lines are overview-level, appropriately split into well-signaled sections, with nothing that should be offloaded to a separate file and no nested references. The 'frontend-slides' mention is a cross-skill pairing hint, not a bundle path.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that explicitly covers what the skill does and when to use it, with comprehensive natural trigger terms in proper third-person voice. The only weakness is minor overlap risk on terms like 'pitch decks' that could also fire for general slide-building skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description lists multiple concrete actions and objects — 'Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials' — with comprehensive coverage of the domain and third-person voice throughout.	5 / 5
Completeness	Both 'what' ('Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos...') and 'when' ('Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables...') are explicitly and concretely answered with trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural keywords users would actually say are comprehensively covered: 'pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans', including multiple synonyms for the same intent.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The fundraising niche is clear and triggers are distinct, but 'pitch decks' and 'financial models' carry minor overlap risk with general presentation- and spreadsheet-focused skills. Not a 3 (the niche is well-defined), not a 5 (some trigger terms are shared with adjacent document-creation skills).	4 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: affaan-m/ECC
Path: .cursor/skills/investor-materials/SKILL.md
Commit: c70874f

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.