CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

investor-materials

Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.

75

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a lean, well-organized instruction-only skill with a clear workflow, an explicit consistency checkpoint, and a validation quality gate. Its main gap is actionability: some drafting steps stay abstract and lack worked examples or templates.

Suggestions

Add one short worked example or skeleton for at least one asset type (e.g., a use-of-funds table template or a sample pitch-deck outline) to move guidance from concrete-direction to copy-paste-ready.

Make the 'draft the asset with explicit logic' step more concrete by specifying what 'explicit logic' should look like (e.g., show assumptions as labeled rows, link each revenue layer to its driver).

Optionally externalize the per-asset guidance (deck flow, financial-model checklist) into a reference file to keep SKILL.md a tighter overview while preserving depth.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — sections like 'Golden Rule' and 'Quality Gate' are tight checklists with no concept-padding or explanation of fundamentals. It is not a 2 because every line earns its place and there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten.

3 / 3

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it has concrete guidance ('bear / base / bull cases', 'answer the exact question asked', 'clean layer-by-layer revenue logic'), but steps like 'draft the asset with explicit logic' stay abstract without a worked example or template. It is not a 3 because guidance is not fully copy-paste-ready or example-backed; it is not a 1 because it does give specific, actionable direction rather than vague abstraction.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Core Workflow is a clear five-step sequence, the Golden Rule supplies a 'stop and resolve them before drafting' checkpoint, and the Quality Gate is an explicit validation checklist with a feedback loop. It is not a 2 because validation checkpoints and error-recovery are explicit rather than implicit.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single self-contained file with well-organized sections (When to Activate, Golden Rule, Core Workflow, Asset Guidance, Red Flags, Quality Gate) and no nested bundle references — the only external pointer is to a sibling skill, not a bundled file. It is not a 2 because content is appropriately organized and there are no buried or multi-level references.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, trigger-rich, and complete, naming six concrete deliverables and pairing them with an explicit 'Use when' clause. It is concise and clearly distinguishable from other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete asset types — 'pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials' — matching the anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions. It is not a 2 because it enumerates six distinct deliverables rather than naming only a domain and a few actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what (asset types) and when via the explicit 'Use when the user needs...' trigger clause. It is not a 2 because the when is explicit, not merely implied, satisfying the explicit-trigger requirement.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user-facing terms — 'investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans' — covering phrasing a user would actually say. It is not a 2 because these are common variations users would naturally say, not jargon or a single keyword.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear fundraising/investor-materials niche with distinct triggers unlikely to overlap with unrelated skills. It is not a 2 because the trigger language is specific to investor-facing fundraising assets rather than a generic document scope.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.