CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

investor-outreach

Draft cold emails, warm intro blurbs, follow-ups, update emails, and investor communications for fundraising. Use when the user wants outreach to angels, VCs, strategic investors, or accelerators and needs concise, personalized, investor-facing messaging.

74

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is investor-outreach in affaan-m/ECC

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill that gives concrete, actionable guidance for each investor-outreach message type with a validation quality gate. Its main gaps are the absence of a worked example email and an explicit retry loop tied to the quality gate.

Suggestions

Add one short worked example (e.g., a sample cold email) to make the Cold Email Structure template copy-paste concrete and lift actionability.

Make the Quality Gate an explicit feedback loop: 'If any check fails, rewrite the offending section and re-run the gate before delivering.'

Consider extracting the Follow-Up Cadence and Hard Bans into a short reference file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview, improving progressive disclosure for the longer-than-minimal body.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean throughout — short bullets and numbered lists with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place ('Keep the ask low-friction', 'keep the forwardable blurb under 100 words').

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance throughout — a 5-part cold email structure, day-by-day follow-up cadence (day 0, day 4 or 5, day 10 to 12), a 100-word blurb limit, and a hard-bans list — but lacks a worked example of a finished email, the minor gap keeping it below a 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The follow-up cadence is clearly sequenced with a stop condition and a pre-delivery Quality Gate checklist acts as a validation checkpoint, but there is no explicit 'if the gate fails, rewrite and re-check' feedback loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly labeled sections (When to Activate, Core Rules, Hard Bans, Cold Email Structure, Follow-Up Cadence, etc.) with all content appropriately placed in a single self-contained file; no external references are needed, though at ~85 lines it slightly exceeds the under-50-lines simple-skill threshold.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that concisely states multiple concrete capabilities and pairs them with an explicit, trigger-rich 'Use when' clause. It is specific, complete, and clearly distinct from general writing skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists five concrete actions — 'Draft cold emails, warm intro blurbs, follow-ups, update emails, and investor communications' — giving comprehensive coverage of the skill's capabilities rather than vague abstraction.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (drafting the listed investor communications for fundraising) and 'when' ('Use when the user wants outreach to angels, VCs, strategic investors, or accelerators...') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural user phrases and synonyms — 'cold emails, warm intro blurbs, follow-ups, outreach, angels, VCs, strategic investors, accelerators, fundraising' — the terms a user would actually say when needing this skill.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (investor-facing fundraising outreach) with distinct triggers like angels, VCs, and accelerators, giving minimal overlap risk with other communication skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.