Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill delivers a clear, actionable iterative-retrieval workflow with code and worked examples, but relies on several undefined helper functions and re-explains background concepts. Organization is solid for a single file, though some content could be tightened.
Suggestions
Define or stub the helper functions (retrieveFiles, scoreRelevance, extractPatterns, extractKeywords, hasCriticalGaps) so the code is directly executable.
Trim the '問題' section's re-explanation of the context problem and standard failure modes, which Claude already understands.
Move the detailed scoring rubric or worked examples into a reference file and signal it from the main body to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with code and concise phase descriptions, but the '問題' section re-explains the context problem and standard failure modes that Claude largely already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete JavaScript is provided for each phase plus two worked examples, but several helpers (retrieveFiles, scoreRelevance, extractPatterns, hasCriticalGaps) are undefined, so it is not fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-phase DISPATCH→EVALUATE→REFINE→LOOP cycle is clearly sequenced with a stopping checkpoint (highRelevance >= 3 and no critical gaps), but hasCriticalGaps is undefined so the validation is partly implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single-file body is well-organized into clear sections with a '相關' pointer to external material, but at ~200 lines with no content split into bundle files it is not fully appropriate for a one-level-deep structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |