Conciseness

The body is dense, imperative, and assumes competence with no basic-concept explanations, but boundary caveats are repeated ('ECC itself does no browser automation' appears twice; 'does not move funds or reserve capacity' appears in three sections), so some tokens could be trimmed — the minor-trimming anchor, not the every-token-earns-its-place anchor at 5.

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with complete flag sets (the `ecc ito find` example, the evals invocation with gating flags) plus a concrete MCP server JSON config cover the common cases — the exact anchor-5 pattern; not 4 because there are no gaps in executable detail.

Workflow Clarity

The CLI workflow is a clearly sequenced 7-step list with explicit validation checkpoints (auth validation, explicit buyer authority before an RFQ, status check before repeating `find` after an ambiguous transport failure, a hard gating checklist for evals) and error-recovery guidance, matching the validation-and-feedback-loops anchor; destructive/spending operations all carry explicit approval gates, so the score-3 cap does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the single file is cleanly sectioned with headers, but at ~165 lines the MCP configuration and node-qualification sections could be split into one-level-deep reference files — good structure with minor organization gaps (anchor 4), short of anchor 5's well-signaled references, and above anchor 3 since nothing that clearly belongs in a separate file is buried or unorganized.

Specificity

Lists five concrete third-person actions ('Query live GPU inventory, submit an authenticated Itô fixed-rate RFQ, inspect RFQ or procurement status, revoke device credentials, and run explicitly gated node qualification') covering the full CLI surface, matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor; not 4 because there are no coverage gaps.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (first sentence enumerates the capabilities) and when ('Use when a user asks to find H100/H200 capacity...'), with concrete trigger phrases — the exact anchor-5 pattern; a 'Use when' clause is present so the score-3 cap does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases ('find H100/H200 capacity', 'request a fixed compute rate', 'check Itô compute status', 'validate GPU nodes', 'revoke Itô access', 'rent or purchase GPU compute') include synonyms and product names a user would actually say, matching the comprehensive-synonyms anchor rather than the few-terms-missing anchor at 4.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (Itô fixed-rate GPU compute RFQs via the canonical CLI) with vendor- and product-specific triggers, so overlap with generic cloud, GPU, or purchasing skills is minimal — the distinct-triggers anchor, not the minor-overlap anchor at 4.