CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

laravel-verification

Verification loop for Laravel projects: env checks, linting, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness.

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is tdg-personal/laravel-verification

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a tight, executable verification pipeline with explicit gating and validation checkpoints across seven sequenced phases, and it is well-organized as a self-contained skill with no external file dependencies.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and efficient: terse gating bullets ('stop immediately if they fail', 'any failure blocks release') and direct commands with no padding explaining what Laravel, Composer, or PHPStan are; every section earns its tokens.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands such as 'vendor/bin/pint --test', 'composer audit', 'php artisan migrate --pretend', and 'XDEBUG_MODE=coverage php artisan test --coverage' rather than pseudocode or vague direction.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear 7-phase sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: 'Environment and Composer checks gate everything else; stop immediately if they fail', 'Linting/static analysis should be clean before running full tests', and 'any failure blocks release', plus a feedback-style job side-effect check in Phase 7.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Self-contained with no bundle files (references/scripts/assets are empty), organized into clear one-level sections (When to Use, How It Works, Phases 1-7, Examples) with no nested references, satisfying the simple self-contained skill allowance.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and clearly scoped to Laravel, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and omits some natural user phrasings (e.g., CI pipeline, PR checks), which caps completeness and trigger-term quality at 2.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause naming natural triggers, e.g. 'Use before opening a PR, after major refactors, or pre-deployment for a Laravel project.'

Broaden trigger terms to include phrases users actually say, such as 'CI pipeline', 'PR checks', 'before deploy', and 'Laravel test run'.

Keep the concrete phase list but pair it with the explicit when-guidance so both what and when are answered in the description.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Quotes concrete actions 'env checks, linting, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness', listing multiple specific capabilities rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers what the skill does via the enumerated verification phases, but the description has no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, capping completeness at 2 per the rubric guidelines.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant terms like 'Laravel', 'tests', 'coverage', 'security scans', and 'linting', but misses common natural variations a user might say such as 'CI pipeline', 'before deploy', or 'PR checks', and lacks explicit 'Use when' phrasing.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped explicitly to 'Laravel projects', a clear niche with distinct triggers that is unlikely to fire for non-Laravel skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.