Conciseness

Dense and operational with no concept-teaching padding; the fold-into-commit block is defined once in Step 3 and referenced from Steps 4/5b rather than repeated. Minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed ("An amend leaves a secret that was removed from a file out of the new commit. A new commit on top would publish it in history", "Most repos trip this on a logo or a font") keep it at anchor 4 rather than 5.

Actionability

Overwhelmingly executable: copy-paste bash for staging (mkdir), the amend/fold sequence, the Step 7 gate chain (git ls-files / ls-tree / status / rev-list / rev-parse), and gh repo create, plus complete Agent prompts enumerating all 7 scan categories. Not fully executable everywhere — the /opensource package section has the literal stub prompt="Package: {resolved_path} ..." — which is exactly anchor 4's 'minor gaps'; far above anchor 3's pseudocode level.

Workflow Clarity

Seven explicitly sequenced steps with validation checkpoints throughout: sanitizer PASS/FAIL gate, max-3 retry loop, unreadable-count gate with unknown/missing-count handling, stop conditions, and post-packaging re-scan keyed to {SCANNED_COMMIT}. For a destructive operation (publishing secrets publicly), this matches the top anchor's 'explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery'.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized single file: commands table, per-command protocol sections, staging layout diagram, and anti-patterns, with a single clearly-signaled one-level pointer to the sibling security-review skill and no nested references. Not 5 because there are no reference files at all and ~320 lines means the sub-command protocols (verify/package/list/status) or the unreadable-files protocol could be split into a references file to keep SKILL.md lean; well above anchor 3's buried or mis-signaled structure.

Specificity

Names several concrete actions — "fork, sanitize, and package private projects" with "stripped of secrets" and "Chains 3 agents (forker, sanitizer, packager)" — matching the 'lists several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. It falls short of 5 because packaging outputs and the GitHub publish step are not enumerated, but exceeds 3's '1-2 concrete actions'.

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ("fork, sanitize, and package private projects for safe public release") and when ("Use when a private project must be forked, stripped of secrets, and packaged for public release") with concrete trigger phrases, exactly matching the top anchor. A missing Use-when clause would cap at 3; here it is explicit and specific.

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit triggers "/opensource", "open source this", "make this public", "prepare for open source" are natural phrases a user would say, giving good keyword coverage. Not 5 because synonyms like "publish this", "public release", or "clean this for release" are absent; not 3 because multiple natural variations are present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche — converting private projects to safe public releases — with distinct triggers ("make this public", "/opensource") unlikely to fire for other skills, including the adjacent security-review. Minimal conflict risk matches the anchor 5 example's profile.